Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30142177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Sensing of Escherichia coli and LPS by mammary epithelial cells is modulated by O-antigen chain and CD14.

Mégane Védrine, Camille Berthault, Cindy Leroux, Maryline Répérant-Ferter, Christophe Gitton, Sarah Barbey, Pascal Rainard, Florence B Gilbert, Pierre Germon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extracts ofBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigens-bacterial glycans made to measure.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mégane VédrineISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Camille BerthaultISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Cindy LerouxISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Maryline Répérant-FerterISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Christophe GittonISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Sarah BarbeyUE 0326 Domaine Expérimental du Pin-Au-Haras, INRA, Le-Pin-Au-Haras, France.
Pascal RainardISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Florence B GilbertISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Pierre GermonISP UMR 1282, INRA, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-876X
Université de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli is one of the major pathogens causing mastitis in dairy cattle. Yet, the factors which mediate the ability for E. coli to develop in the bovine mammary gland remain poorly elucidated. In a mouse model, infections induced by the reference mastitis E. coli P4 showed a strong colonisation of the mammary gland, while this strain had a low stimulating power on cells of the PS bovine mammary epithelial cell line. In order to understand if such a reduced response contributes to the severity of infection, a library of random mutants of P4 strain was screened to identify mutants inducing stronger response of PS cells. Among hyper-stimulating mutants, six were altered in genes involved in biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and had lost their O-polysaccharide region, suggesting that the presence of O-antigen impairs the response of PS cells to LPS. Using purified smooth (S) and rough (R) fractions of LPS, we showed that the R-LPS fraction induced a stronger response from PS cells than the smooth LPS fraction. Biological activity of the S-LPS fraction could be restored by the addition of recombinant bovine CD14 (rbCD14), indicating a crucial role of CD14 in the recognition of S-LPS by Mammary Epithelial Cells (MEC). When S-LPS and R-LPS were injected in udder quarters of healthy lactating cows, an inflammation developed in all infused quarters, but the S-LPS induced a more intense pro-inflammatory response, possibly in relation to sizeable concentrations of CD14 in milk. Altogether, our results demonstrate that the O-antigen modulates the pro-inflammatory response of MEC to LPS, that S-LPS and R-LPS trigger different responses of MEC and that these responses depend on the presence of CD14.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCell LineChemokinesCytokinesDNA Transposable ElementsEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesMastitis, BovineMilkMutagenesisChemokinesCytokinesDNA Transposable ElementsLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesO AntigensRecombinant ProteinsToll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID30142177
PMCPMC6108492
OpenAlexW2888632758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.