Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30142171›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Perceptions of HIV cure research among people living with HIV in Australia.

Jennifer Power, Andrew Westle, Gary W Dowsett, Jayne Lucke, Joseph D Tucker, Jeremy Sugarman, Sharon R Lewin, Sophie Hill, Graham Brown, Jack Wallace and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer PowerAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6566-3214
Andrew WestleAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Gary W DowsettAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jayne LuckeAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Joseph D TuckerUNC Project-China, University of North Carolina, Guangzhou, China.
Jeremy SugarmanBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Sharon R LewinThe Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Sophie HillCentre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Graham BrownAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jack WallaceAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jacqui RichmondAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Using NK Cells to eliminate the latent HIV reservoirU19AI096113 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARGOLIS, DAVID M. · 2011 to 2015
$39.5M
Unintended and Intended Implications of HIV Cure: A Social and Ethical AnalysisR01AI108366 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RENNIE, STUART, TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108366NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation in HIV cure-related clinical trials that involve antiretroviral treatment (ART) interruption may pose substantial individual risks for people living with HIV (PLHIV) without any therapeutic benefit. As such, it is important that the views of PLHIV are considered in the design of HIV cure research trials. Examining the lived experience of PLHIV provides unique and valuable perspectives on the risks and benefits of HIV cure research. In this study, we interviewed 20 PLHIV in Australia about their knowledge and attitudes toward clinical HIV cure research and explored their views regarding participation in HIV cure clinical trials, including those that involve ART interruption. Data were analysed thematically, using both inductive and deductive coding techniques, to identity themes related to perceptions of HIV cure research and PLHIV's assessment of the possible risks and benefits of trial participation. Study findings revealed interviewees were willing to consider participation in HIV cure research for social reasons, most notably the opportunity to help others. Concerns raised about ART interruption related to the social and emotional impact of viral rebound, including fear of onward HIV transmission and anxiety about losing control. These findings reveal the ways in which PLHIV perspectives deepen our understanding of HIV cure research, moving beyond a purely clinical assessment of risks and benefits in order to consider the social context.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsAustraliaFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansMalePerceptionQualitative ResearchSocial EnvironmentAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID30142171
PMCPMC6108463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.