SynthesisCancer2018
Alternative payment and care-delivery models in oncology: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of Managed Entry Agreements for Innovative Therapies in Different Settings and Combinations: A Feasibility Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Monetary Incentives in Physician Groups: A Systematic Review of Reviews.Applied health economics and health policy · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Global Budget Revenue Model and Care for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Article
- From endoscopy to surgery: a translational perspective on early esophageal cancer management.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Mathematical Modeling for the Assessment of Public Policies in the Cancer Health-Care System Implemented for the Colombian Case.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Associations between healthcare costs and care experiences among older adults with and without cancer.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2023Article
- The implementation of value-based frameworks, clinical care pathways, and alternative payment models for cancer care in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- Resource and Reimbursement Barriers to Comprehensive Cancer Care Delivery: An Analysis of Association of Community Cancer Centers Survey Data.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Policies and Practices to Address Cancer's Long-Term Adverse Consequences.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Strategies for Improving Access to Cancer Services in Rural Communities: A Pre-implementation Study.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- Article
- Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Assessment of Patient Attribution to Care From Medical Oncologists, Surgeons, or Radiation Oncologists After Newly Diagnosed Cancer.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Radiation Therapy for Men With Newly Diagnosed Low-Burden Metastatic Prostate Cancer.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Value and affordability of CAR T-cell therapy in the United States.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Review
- "Choosing Wisely" in Breast Cancer Surgery: Drivers of Low Value Care.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Society of gynecologic oncology future of physician payment reform task force: Lessons learned in developing and implementing surgical alternative payment models.Gynecologic oncology · 2020Review
- Association Between Spending and Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rising US health care costs have led to the creation of alternative payment and care-delivery models designed to maximize outcomes and/or minimize costs through changes in reimbursement and care delivery. The impact of these interventions in cancer care is unclear. This review was undertaken to describe the landscape of new alternative payment and care-delivery models in cancer care. In this systematic review, 22 alternative payment and/or care-delivery models in cancer care were identified. These included 6 bundled payments, 4 accountable care organizations, 9 patient-centered medical homes, and 3 other interventions. Only 12 interventions reported outcomes; the majority (n = 7; 58%) improved value, 4 had no impact, and 1 reduced value, but only initially. Heterogeneity of outcomes precluded a meta-analysis. Despite the growth in alternative payment and delivery models in cancer, there is limited evidence to evaluate their efficacy. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.