Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30141773›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Causal contribution and dynamical encoding in the striatum during evidence accumulation.

Michael M Yartsev, Timothy D Hanks, Alice Misun Yoon, Carlos D Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  16. Brain-wide coordination of internal signals during decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael M Yartsev *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-2801
Timothy D Hanks *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-4475
Alice Misun YoonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-2796
Carlos D BrodyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-561X

Funding

Neural circuit underlying decisions driven by accumulation evidenceR01MH108358 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, CARLOS D · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Testing the roles of rat parietal and frontal cortices in a sensory decision taskF32MH098572 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HANKS, TIMOTHY D. · 2013 to 2015
$112k
NIH HHS F32MH098572NIH HHS R01MH108358NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH098572NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A broad range of decision-making processes involve gradual accumulation of evidence over time, but the neural circuits responsible for this computation are not yet established. Recent data indicate that cortical regions that are prominently associated with accumulating evidence, such as the posterior parietal cortex and the frontal orienting fields, may not be directly involved in this computation. Which, then, are the regions involved? Regions that are directly involved in evidence accumulation should directly influence the accumulation-based decision-making behavior, have a graded neural encoding of accumulated evidence and contribute throughout the accumulation process. Here, we investigated the role of the anterior dorsal striatum (ADS) in a rodent auditory evidence accumulation task using a combination of behavioral, pharmacological, optogenetic, electrophysiological and computational approaches. We find that the ADS is the first brain region known to satisfy the three criteria. Thus, the ADS may be the first identified node in the network responsible for evidence accumulation.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAction PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalModels, NeurologicalNeostriatumNeuronsOptogeneticsRatsSensationdecision makingneuroscienceratstriatum

Identifiers

PMID30141773
PMCPMC6147735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.