ArticleBritish dental journal2018
Genetic testing for amelogenesis imperfecta: knowledge and attitudes of paediatric dentists.
Article in British dental journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A UK-based consensus on clinical decision flowcharts for managing childhood amelogenesis imperfecta in the permanent dentition.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Establishment of a clinical network for children with amelogenesis imperfecta and dentinogenesis imperfecta in the UK: 4-year experience.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024Article
- Article
- The burden of dental care in Amelogenesis Imperfecta paediatric patients in the UK NHS: a retrospective, multi-centred analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021Article
- Welcome to the new genomics: an introduction to the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for oral healthcare professionals.British dental journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genetic testing is increasingly applied across healthcare reflecting the value to diagnosis, clinical decision-making, service organisation and advancement of the research-informed evidence base. Patient expectations are changing. Genetic testing has not been part of dental practice. Introduction of an NHS-targeted gene panel test for amelogenesis imperfecta (AI), a heterogeneous genetic disorder affecting enamel appearance and function, represents a paradigm shift. This impacts on specialists in paediatric dentistry and other members of the dental team delivering longitudinal care for individuals with AI. Aim: To evaluate the opinions of paediatric dentists on genetic testing for dental conditions using AI as the exemplar. Method: Two focus groups of nine UK NHS paediatric dentists each were audio recorded (September 2016) and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis was undertaken using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Results: A wide range of views reflected existing insight and understanding. Three core concepts of justification, ownership and challenges emerged. The clinicians were generally open to involvement with genetic testing in paediatric dentistry, but required more support. Conclusion: Areas for clarification and professional development were identified as important in ensuring that genetic testing in dentistry, which is currently in its infancy, reaches translational potential and enhances patient care as this area of healthcare continues to advance rapidly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30141472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.