Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30141120›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2018

Ants Response to Human-Induced Disturbance in a Rain Tropical Forest.

B Walter, A Graclik, P Tryjanowski, O Wasielewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B WalterInstitute of Zoology, Poznan Univ of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71 C, 60-625, Poznan, Poland.
A GraclikInstitute of Zoology, Poznan Univ of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71 C, 60-625, Poznan, Poland.
P TryjanowskiInstitute of Zoology, Poznan Univ of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71 C, 60-625, Poznan, Poland.
O WasielewskiInstitute of Zoology, Poznan Univ of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71 C, 60-625, Poznan, Poland. oskarw@au.poznan.pl.

Funding

National Science Centre Poland N N304 294240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high rate of human-induced disturbance of tropical ecosystems results in enormous loss of biodiversity due to local extinctions. Yet, mechanisms at the population level that lead to the extinction are still poorly understood. Here we tested the hypothesis that human-induced disturbance results in smaller amount of nesting sites for wood-dwelling arthropods that leads to smaller population size and diminished reproduction, and therefore, may promote local extinctions. We completed censuses in less-disturbed and human-disturbed secondary rain forest plots in Puerto Rico. We measured population size and brood production in wood-nesting ants and examined whether these parameters differ between less-disturbed and more-disturbed habitats. In addition, we measured volume of wood parts of all inhabited and potential nesting sites to assess nest site availability. We found that more human-disturbed forests furnish smaller nest sites, resulting in diminished population size and lowered brood production. Our study shows that human-induced disturbance decreases volume of available nesting sites that leads to decreased population size and lowered reproduction. Thus, in addition to the well-documented loss of species richness in human-disturbed tropical habitats, we demonstrated the direct effect of the disturbance that may promote vulnerability of local populations.

Indexed as

AntsNesting BehaviorRainforestAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesHispanic or LatinoHuman ActivitiesHumansPopulation DensityReproductionTropical ClimateAnts, biodiversity loss, colony size, deforestation, Platythyrea punctata tropical rain forest

Identifiers

PMID30141120
PMCPMC6267389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.