Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30141109›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

Vocal fold paresis: Medical specialists' opinions on standard diagnostics and laryngeal findings.

Gerd Fabian Volk, Sebastian Themel, Markus Gugatschka, Claus Pototschnig, Christian Sittel, Andreas H Müller, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Working Group on Laryngology and Tracheal Diseases of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and the Working Group on Neurolaryngology of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Prognosis of Dysphagia in Pediatric Patients With Vocal Fold Immobility.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. [The key problems of diagnosis and treatment of vocal cord paralysis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic limitation of laryngostroboscopy in comparison to laryngeal electromyography in synkinesis in unilateral vocal fold paralysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  8. Inter-rater reliability of seven neurolaryngologists in laryngeal EMG signal interpretation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerd Fabian VolkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Phoniatry/Pedaudiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian ThemelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Phoniatry/Pedaudiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Markus GugatschkaDepartment of Phoniatrics, ENT University Hospital Graz, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Claus PototschnigDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian SittelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Andreas H MüllerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Phoniatry/Pedaudiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. orlando.guntinas@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-0784
Working Group on Laryngology and Tracheal Diseases of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and the Working Group on Neurolaryngology of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversität Innsbruck · ATGraz University Hospital · ATKatharinenhospital · DESRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is still no clear consensus on the diagnostic value of specific laryngeal findings in patients with suspected vocal fold paresis (VFP). The aim of the study was to establish expert opinion on criteria for the diagnosis of VFP in Europe.

methodsA cross-sectional survey using the questionnaire introduced by Wu and Sulica for US American experts was addressed to laryngeal experts in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland and in a second survey wave to members of the European Laryngological Society.

results100 respondents returned survey 1 (response rate 47.2%). 26% worked at a university department. 28% regularly used laryngeal electromyography (LEMG). A pathologic test results in LEMG was considered to have the strongest positive predictive value for VFP (79 ± 23%), followed by a decreased vocal fold abduction (70 ± 29%), decreased vocal fold adduction (61 ± 34%), and atrophy of the hemilarynx (61 ± 31%). The multivariate analysis showed the predictive value of LEMG was estimated lower by respondents from non-university hospital (β = - 16.33; confidence interval (CI) = - 25.63 to - 7.02; p = 0.001) and higher in hospitals with higher frequency of VFP patients per months (β = 1.57; CI = - 0.98 to 2.16; p < 0.0001). 30 ELS members returned survey 2 (response rate, 8.4%). Their answers were not significantly different to survey 1.

conclusionsThe laryngology experts in Europe rely on LEMG for diagnosis of VFP like the US American experts, but paradoxically only a minority uses LEMG frequently. Next to LEMG, motion abnormities were considered to have the best predictive value for the diagnosis of VFP.

Indexed as

ConsensusSpecializationCross-Sectional StudiesElectromyographyHumansLaryngoscopyLarynxPhonationPredictive Value of TestsSurveys and QuestionnairesVocal Cord ParalysisVocal CordsLaryngeal electromyographyLaryngoscopyLaryngostroboscopyNeurolaryngologySurveyVocal fold immobilityVocal fold motionVocal fold paralysisVocal fold paresis

Identifiers

PMID30141109
OpenAlexW2888171151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.