ArticleClinical oral investigations2019
Performance status scale for head and neck scores for oral cancer survivors: predictors and factors for improving quality of life.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Five-year long-term functional and quality of life outcomes in total glossectomy survivors.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of Oral Exercise on Trismus after Oral Cancer Radiotherapy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Functional Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2022Article
- Late and Long-Term Treatment-Related Effects and Survivorship for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- Prognostic factors associated with achieving total oral diet following osteocutaneous microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction of the oral cavity.Oral oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to determine the factors associated with long-term quality of life of oral cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 508 survivors were assessed using the performance status scale for head and neck (PSS-HN), which comprises Eating in Public (E-Public), Normalcy of Diet (N-Diet), and Understandability of Speech (U-Speech). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed.
resultsThe median time between the end of treatment and participating in the survey was 38 months (range, 6-250). Overall, 57-60% of survivors achieved full performance (100 score) of each PSS-HN score, whereas 15% had moderate or severe impairment (≤ 50 score) in E-Public and N-Diet, and 4% had impairment in U-Speech. These three scores deteriorated with increasing T-stage. Age, soft tissue reconstruction, trismus, and missing occlusal contacts on the contralateral side were significantly associated with E-Public and N-Diet. Neck dissection, hard tissue reconstruction, and missing occlusal contacts bilaterally were associated with U-Speech score.
conclusionOlder age, T4 tumor, and soft tissue reconstruction were predictors of low E-Public and N-Diet performance scores. Increasing mouth opening and maintaining optimal occlusal contacts on the contralateral side may be effective ways to improve N-Diet and E-Public performance. Maintaining optimal occlusal contacts bilaterally may be effective for improving speech performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oral health care to increase optimal occlusal contacts and rehabilitation of trismus may be promising factors to improve the functional performance of oral cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.