Trial reportJAMA cardiology2018
Association of Natriuretic Peptides With Cardiovascular Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Secondary Analysis of the TOPCAT Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00094302 (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in prevalence of comorbidities in heart failure clinical trials.European journal of heart failure · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of luseogliflozin on estimated plasma volume in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2022Trial
- Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization, Clinical Outcomes, and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Valsartan in HFpEF.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Trial
- Association of β-Blocker Use With Heart Failure Hospitalizations and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the TOPCAT Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Biomarkers in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (from the NEAT-HFpEF Trial).The American journal of cardiology · 2019Trial
- B-Type Natriuretic Peptide During Treatment With Sacubitril/Valsartan: The PARADIGM-HF Trial.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Trial
- Left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: mechanisms and treatment.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Diagnostic significance of cardiac bridging integrator 1 score in hospitalized patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its assessment of prognostic value for major adverse cardiac events.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting Heart Failure Outcomes Using Patient-Reported Health Status: Real-World Validation of the KCCQ-12.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- The level of human epididymis protein 4 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with ejection fraction preserved heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on NT-proBNP for Cardiovascular Risk Screening in Asymptomatic Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2025Article
- AI hybrid survival assessment for advanced heart failure patients with renal dysfunction.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of measurement of myocardial extracellular volume using dual-energy CT in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fibroblast activation protein: Pivoting cancer/chemotherapeutic insight towards heart failure.Biochemical pharmacology · 2024Review
- Racial differences in low natriuretic peptide levels: Implications for heart failure clinical trials.American heart journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Increased Risk of Heart Failure in Elderly Patients Treated with Beta-Blockers After AV Node Ablation.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023Article
- Association between Cardiovascular Disease and Liver Disease, from a Clinically Pragmatic Perspective as a Cardiologist.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Utility of cardiac bioenzymes in predicting cardiovascular outcomes in SARS-CoV-2.World journal of virology · 2022Article
- DNA Methylation of the Natriuretic Peptide System Genes and Ischemic Stroke: Gene-Based and Gene Set Analyses.Neurology. Genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Contemporary clinical trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) apply natriuretic peptide (NP) thresholds to identify patients who are more likely to have the disease of interest and to enrich the baseline risk of the enrolled cohort. Objective: To determine whether age, race/ethnicity, obesity, renal function, and atrial fibrillation (AF) affect the levels of NPs in HFpEF and whether the prognostic significance of NPs varies in these clinically important subgroups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT) evaluated the distribution and prognostic significance of NPs across 6 subgroups comprising 1057 adult patients (60%) in the Americas region of TOPCAT with symptomatic heart failure (HF) and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or more with available NPs at baseline. Exposures: Natriuretic peptides were log-transformed and standardized (expressed per 1 SD, z score) and assessed in 6 subgroups: age (cutoff, 70 years), black race, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; cutoff, 30 kg/m2), waist circumference (cutoff, 102 cm for men, 88 cm for women), estimated glomerular filtration rate (cutoff, 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a history of AF. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to composite cardiovascular death, hospitalization for HF, or aborted cardiac arrest at mean (SD) 2.4-year (1.5) follow-up. Results: Of 1057 participants, the mean (SD) age was 72 (10) years, 183 (17.3%) were black, the mean (SD) BMI was 33.4 (8.6) kg/m2, the mean (SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate was 64.6 (21.8) mL/min/1.73 m2, and 472 (45%) had a history of AF. Median B-type NP (n = 698) and N-terminal pro-B-type NP concentrations (n = 359) were 257 (interquartile range, 149-443) ng/L and 959 (interquartile range, 554-2015) ng/L, respectively. Natriuretic peptide concentrations varied by up to 0.5 SD within the 6 subgroups, being higher in older patients with nonblack race, a lower BMI, a lower waist circumference, a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and a history of AF. Elevated NP levels (per 1-SD increase) were independently associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.54; P < .001) consistently across all investigated subgroups (interaction P > .05). In TOPCAT Americas (n = 1767), 791 (45%) were enrolled based on elevated NP levels as the qualifying criterion (as opposed to a history of HF hospitalization). This proportion was 31% (93 of 302), 34% (258 of 760), and 39% (443 of 1144) for black race, younger than 70 years, and a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Natriuretic peptides remain important biomarkers of prognosis in HFpEF, even in subgroups who tend to have lower NP levels. A single, absolute NP threshold for inclusion in contemporary HFpEF trials may lead to an underrepresentation of certain demographic and clinical subgroups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094302.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.