Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30140851›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2018

Evaluation of a Combined Reflectance Confocal Microscopy-Optical Coherence Tomography Device for Detection and Depth Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Aditi Sahu, Oriol Yélamos, Nicusor Iftimia, Miguel Cordova, Christi Alessi-Fox, Melissa Gill, Gopi Maguluri, Stephen W Dusza, Cristián Navarrete-Dechent, Salvador González and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Use of non-invasive optical imaging techniques in dermatology.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aditi SahuDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Oriol YélamosDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nicusor IftimiaBiomedical Optics Technologies Group, Physical Sciences Inc, Andover, Massachusetts.
Miguel CordovaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christi Alessi-FoxClinical Development, Caliber Imaging and Diagnostics Inc, Rochester, New York.
Melissa GillSkinMedical Research and Diagnostics, PLLC, Dobbs Ferry, New York.
Gopi MaguluriBiomedical Optics Technologies Group, Physical Sciences Inc, Andover, Massachusetts.
Stephen W DuszaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cristián Navarrete-DechentDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Salvador GonzálezDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anthony M RossiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ashfaq A MarghoobDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Milind RajadhyakshaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Chih-Shan J ChenDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCaliber Imaging and Diagnostics (United States) · USDigital Optics Technologies (United States) · USInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESPhysical Sciences (United States) · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Peri-operative confocal imaging-guided laser ablation of basal cell carcinomasR01EB020029 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The limited tissue sampling of a biopsy can lead to an incomplete assessment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) subtypes and depth. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) combined with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging may enable real-time, noninvasive, comprehensive three-dimensional sampling in vivo, which may improve the diagnostic accuracy and margin assessment of BCCs. Objective: To determine the accuracy of a combined RCM-OCT device for BCC detection and deep margin assessment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pilot study was carried out on 85 lesions from 55 patients referred for physician consultation or Mohs surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Skin Cancer Center in Hauppauge, New York. These patients were prospectively and consecutively enrolled in the study between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. Patients underwent imaging, with the combined RCM-OCT probe, for previously biopsied, histopathologically confirmed BCCs and lesions clinically or dermoscopically suggestive of BCC. Only patients with available histopathologic examination after imaging were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Improvements in sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for BCC using the combined RCM-OCT probe as well as the correlation between OCT-estimated depth and histopathologically measured depth were investigated. Results: In total, 85 lesions from 55 patients (27 [49%] were female and 28 [51%] were male with a median [range] age of 59 [21-90] years) were imaged. Imaging was performed on 25 previously biopsied and histopathologically confirmed BCCs and 60 previously nonbiopsied but clinically or dermoscopically suspicious lesions. Normal skin and BCC features were correlated and validated with histopathologic examination. In previously biopsied lesions, residual tumors were detected in 12 of 25 (48%) lesions with 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 73.5%-100%) and 23.1% specificity (95% CI, 5.0%-53.8%) for combined RCM-OCT probe. In previously nonbiopsied and suspicious lesions, BCCs were diagnosed in 48 of 60 (80%) lesions with 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 92.6%-100%) and 75% specificity (95% CI, 42.8%-94.5%). Correlation was observed between depth estimated with OCT and depth measured with histopathologic examination: the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.75 (R = 0.86; P < .001) for all lesions, 0.73 (R = 0.85; P < .001) for lesions less than 500 μm deep, and 0.65 (R = 0.43; P < .001) for lesions greater than 500 μm deep. Conclusions and Relevance: Combined RCM-OCT imaging may be prospectively used to comprehensively diagnose lesions suggestive of BCC and triage for treatment. Further validation of this device must be performed on a larger cohort.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBasal Cell CarcinomaBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySkin

Identifiers

PMID30140851
PMCPMC6179925
OpenAlexW2888050590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.