Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30140792›Full record

ArticleSoftware Engineering in Healthcare Systems (SEHS), IEEE/ACM International Workshop on2018

Toward Improving Surgical Outcomes by Incorporating Cognitive Load Measurement into Process-Driven Guidance.

George S Avrunin, Lori A Clarke, Heather M Conboy, Leon J Osterweil, Roger D Dias, Steven J Yule, Julian M Goldman, Marco A Zenati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Software Engineering in Healthcare Systems (SEHS), IEEE/ACM International Workshop on, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A scoping review of cognitive load assessment tools suitable for clinicians performing REBOA.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Service-oriented Device Connectivity interface for a situation recognition system in the OR.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  5. The future of Cardiothoracic surgery in Artificial intelligence.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Review
  6. Association Between Operating Room Noise and Team Cognitive Workload in Cardiac Surgery.IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) · 2022
    Article
  7. Assessing Team Situational Awareness in the Operating Room via Computer Vision.IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

George S AvruninUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Lori A ClarkeUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Heather M ConboyUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Leon J OsterweilUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Roger D DiasBrigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven J YuleHarvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julian M GoldmanMassachusetts General Hospital Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Marco A ZenatiHarvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Developing Standardized Intraoperative Process Models to Enhance Surgical SafetyR01HL126896 · NHLBI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ZENATI, MARCO A. · 2016 to 2023
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper summarizes the accomplishments and recent directions of our medical safety project. Our process-based approach uses a detailed, rigorously-defined, and carefully validated process model to provide a dynamically updated, context-aware and thus, "Smart" Checklist to help process performers understand and manage their pending tasks [7]. This paper focuses on support for teams of performers, working independently as well as in close collaboration, in stressful situations that are life critical. Our recent work has three main thrusts: provide effective real-time guidance for closely collaborating teams; develop and evaluate techniques for measuring cognitive load based on biometric observations and human surveys; and, using these measurements plus analysis and discrete event process simulation, predict cognitive load throughout the process model and propose process modifications to help performers better manage high cognitive load situations. This project is a collaboration among software engineers, surgical team members, human factors researchers, and medical equipment instrumentation experts. Experimental prototype capabilities are being built and evaluated based upon process models of two cardiovascular surgery processes, Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). In this paper we describe our approach for each of the three research thrusts by illustrating our work for heparinization, a common subprocess of both AVR and CABG. Heparinization is a high-risk error-prone procedure that involves complex team interactions and thus highlights the importance of this work for improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

augmented cognitionchecklistscognitive loadProcess modelingsimulationsurgical data sciencesurgical patient safety

Identifiers

PMID30140792
PMCPMC6103223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.