Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30140713›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2018

An Observational Study from Long-Term AAV Re-administration in Two Hemophilia Dogs.

Junjiang Sun, Wenwei Shao, Xiaojing Chen, Elizabeth P Merricks, Lauren Wimsey, Yasmina L Abajas, Glenn P Niemeyer, Clinton D Lothrop, Paul E Monahan, R Jude Samulski and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Immunogenicity of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Vectors for Gene Transfer.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Delivering AAV to the Central Nervous and Sensory Systems.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Immune Response Mechanisms against AAV Vectors in Animal Models.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junjiang SunGene Therapy Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Wenwei ShaoGene Therapy Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Xiaojing ChenGene Therapy Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Elizabeth P MerricksDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lauren WimseyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yasmina L AbajasDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Glenn P NiemeyerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Clinton D LothropDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Paul E MonahanGene Therapy Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
R Jude SamulskiGene Therapy Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Timothy C NicholsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chengwen LiGene Therapy Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Translational Nanosystems for Improved Lung Cancer Treatment with Small MoleculesU54CA151652 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAROON, ZISHAN A, TEPPER, JOEL E · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
VECTOR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY COREP01HL112761 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MONAHAN, PAUL E · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
Enhance AAV Liver Transduction with Capsid Immune EvasionR01AI117408 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, CHENGWEN, SAMULSKI, RICHARD J · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Canine Blood Disease Models and Stem Cell ResourceR24HL086944 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LOTHROP, CLINTON D · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Directed evolution of AAV vectors for hemophilia to evade neutralizationR01HL125749 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, CHENGWEN, NICHOLS, TIMOTHY CHARLES · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151652NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL112761NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125749NHLBI NIH HHS R24 HL086944NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI117408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have been successfully applied in hemophilia clinical trials. However, this approach is limited to patients without AAV-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). In this study, we explored the feasibility of AAV re-administration in hemophilia A dogs treated initially 8 years ago with AAV8.canine FVIII. After the re-administration in two NAb-negative dogs with AAV8 vectors carrying human factor VIII (hFVIII), along with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, we observed a phenotypic improvement in both dogs that persisted in one dog. Phenotypic improvement disappeared at 59 days after re-administration in the other dog, and specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to the capsid were detected at day 17, but not to hFVIII. hFVIII inhibitors were observed at day 59 and gradually increased. Mechanistic studies demonstrated an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, a decrease in immunomodulatory cytokines, as well as lower Tregs after re-administration. These results suggest that hFVIII inhibitor development may contribute to the therapeutic failure via immune response activation. Interestingly, it takes about 30-50 days for AAV NAb titers to decrease by half. Collectively, this study suggests that re-administration of the same AAV serotype after long-term follow-up is feasible and that the study of AAV NAb kinetics will provide important information for predicating the efficacy of re-administration.

Indexed as

AAVhemophiliahFVIIIhFVIII inhibitorhuman factor VIIINAbsneutralizing antibodiesre-administration

Identifiers

PMID30140713
PMCPMC6104583
OpenAlexW2886050722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.