Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30140282›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2018

Current Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: From Demolitive Surgery to Observation.

Ilenia Bartolini, Lapo Bencini, Matteo Risaliti, Maria Novella Ringressi, Luca Moraldi, Antonio Taddei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Analysis of Complications Following Distal Resections for Neuroendocrine Tumors and Adenocarcinoma: Unveiling the Differences.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. EMT Molecular Signatures of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Efficacy and safety ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilenia BartoliniDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0387-2042
Lapo BenciniDepartment of Oncology, AOU Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6331-5542
Matteo RisalitiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-2536
Maria Novella RingressiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-0583
Luca MoraldiDepartment of Oncology, AOU Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6481-4172
Antonio TaddeiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2963-4085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidental diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) greatly increased in the last years. In particular, more frequent diagnosis of small PanNETs leads to many challenging clinical decisions. These tumors are mostly indolent, although a percentage (up to 39%) may reveal an aggressive behaviour despite the small size. Therefore, there is still no unanimity about the best management of tumor smaller than 2 cm. The risks of under/overtreatment should be carefully evaluated with the patient and balanced with the potential morbidities related to surgery. The importance of the Ki-67 index as a prognostic factor is still debated as well. Whenever technically feasible, parenchyma-sparing surgeries lead to the best chance of organ preservation. Lymphadenectomy seems to be another important prognostic issue and, according to recent findings, should be performed in noninsulinoma patients. In the case of enucleation of the lesion, a lymph nodal sampling should always be considered. The relatively recent introduction of minimally invasive techniques (robotic) is a valuable option to deal with these tumors. The current management of PanNETs is analysed throughout the many available published guidelines and evidences with the aim of helping clinicians in the difficult decision-making process.

Identifiers

PMID30140282
PMCPMC6081603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.