ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2018
Updated Editorial Guidance for Quality and Reliability of Research Output.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors that influence eye care utilization in Nigeria: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Retracted Publications Related to Statistics: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Ethics statements in Rheumatology journals: present practices and future directions.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
- Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Plagiarism in Non-Anglophone Countries: a Cross-sectional Survey of Researchers and Journal Editors.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2021Article
- PubMed Central archiving: a major milestone for a scholarly journal.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2020Article
- Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers.Reumatologia · 2020Article
- Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives.Journal of Korean medical science · 2019Article
- Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools.Journal of Korean medical science · 2019Review
- Improving Scientific Writing Skills and Publishing Capacity by Developing University-Based Editing System and Writing Programs.Journal of Korean medical science · 2019Review
- Steps towards quality of open access publishing.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2018Article
- Impacts of the Journal Evaluation Program of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE) on the Quality of the Member Journals.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
- Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Review
- What Sets Indexed Orthopaedic Journals Apart? A Comparative Analysis of Quality Metrics Between Indexed Orthopaedic Journals and Nonindexed Orthopaedic Journals.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few years, updated editorial policy statements of several associations have provided a platform for improving the quality of scientific research and publishing. The updates have particularly pointed to the need for following research reporting standards, authorship and contributorship regulations, implementing digital tools for the identification and crediting academic contributors, and moving towards optimal ethical open-access models. This article overviews some of the recent editorial policy statements of global editorial associations and reflects on the role of the regional counterparts in advancing scholarly publishing. One of the globally promoted documents is the Recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Its latest versions contain statements on proper research reporting, reviewing, editing, and publishing. Points on ethical target journals and 'predatory' sources are also available. This year, in a move to update its editorial policy, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) released the Core Practices, comprehensively reflecting on the major issues in publication ethics. Updated joint statements of medical writers associations are also available to implement transparent policy on contributorship in sponsor-supported research projects and related reports. Several suggestions are put forward to improve global editorial statements on online profiling, crediting, and referencing. It is also highlighted that knowledge and implementation of updated editorial guidance is essential for editors' good standing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.