Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30139919›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Moving beyond panaceas in fisheries governance.

Oran R Young, D G Webster, Michael E Cox, Jesper Raakjær, Lau Øfjord Blaxekjær, Níels Einarsson, Ross A Virginia, James Acheson, Daniel Bromley, Emma Cardwell and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Adoption of community monitoring improves common pool resource management across contexts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Fisheries subsidies reform in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. The distributional outcomes of rights-based management in fisheries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. On design-based empirical research and its interpretation and ethics in sustainability science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strengthening sustainability through data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Oran R YoungBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131.
D G WebsterEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755-3577; d.g.webster@dartmouth.edu.
Michael E CoxEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755-3577.
Jesper RaakjærInnovative Fisheries Management, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Lau Øfjord BlaxekjærNordic Institute for Asian Studies, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Níels EinarssonStefansson Arctic Institute, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.
Ross A VirginiaEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755-3577.
James AchesonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5773.
Daniel BromleyDepartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Emma CardwellSchool of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
Courtney CarothersCollege of Fisheries & Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Anchorage, AK 99501.
Einar EythórssonHigh North Department, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, 9296 Tromsø, Norway.
Richard B HowarthEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755-3577.
Svein JentoftNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.
Bonnie J McCayHuman Ecology, School of Environmental & Biological Sciences, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520.
Fiona McCormackAnthropology, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Gail OsherenkoMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150.
Evelyn PinkertonResource & Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Rob van GinkelSocial and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NA Amsterdam.
James A WilsonMarine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5741.
Louie RiversDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Robyn S WilsonRisk Analysis and Decision Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In fisheries management-as in environmental governance more generally-regulatory arrangements that are thought to be helpful in some contexts frequently become panaceas or, in other words, simple formulaic policy prescriptions believed to solve a given problem in a wide range of contexts, regardless of their actual consequences. When this happens, management is likely to fail, and negative side effects are common. We focus on the case of individual transferable quotas to explore the panacea mindset, a set of factors that promote the spread and persistence of panaceas. These include conceptual narratives that make easy answers like panaceas seem plausible, power disconnects that create vested interests in panaceas, and heuristics and biases that prevent people from accurately assessing panaceas. Analysts have suggested many approaches to avoiding panaceas, but most fail to conquer the underlying panacea mindset. Here, we suggest the codevelopment of an institutional diagnostics toolkit to distill the vast amount of information on fisheries governance into an easily accessible, open, on-line database of checklists, case studies, and related resources. Toolkits like this could be used in many governance settings to challenge users' understandings of a policy's impacts and help them develop solutions better tailored to their particular context. They would not replace the more comprehensive approaches found in the literature but would rather be an intermediate step away from the problem of panaceas.

Indexed as

Fisheriesfisheriesgovernanceindividual transferable quotasinstitutional diagnosticspanacea mindset

Identifiers

PMID30139919
PMCPMC6140477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.