Observational studyBMJ open2018
Association between
Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and the types of tumor markers among Yemeni gastric cancer patients: a case-control study.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- The Bacterial Role in the Progression of Breast Cancer through Mechanism of Gene Action: Future Prospects with Existing Studies.Current genomics · 2025Review
- The clinical significance of some serum tumor markers among chronic patients with Helicobacter pylori infections in Ibb Governorate, Yemen.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Nutritional immunity: the impact of metals on lung immune cells and the airway microbiome during chronic respiratory disease.Respiratory research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective
designObservational retrospective study.
settingThe study was performed in Beijing, China, where enrolled subjects had all passed health examinations during the period of 2012-2016. Subjects were categorised into
participantsA total of 14 689 subjects were included and 6493 (44.2%) subjects were infected by
resultsAfter adjusting for the confounding factors, infections with
conclusionsIn this observational retrospective study, we observed the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.