Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30139841›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Patient-Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Areej El-Jawahri, Margaret Nelson-Lowe, Harry VanDusen, Lara Traeger, Gregory A Abel, Joseph A Greer, Amir Fathi, David P Steensma, Thomas W LeBlanc, Zhigang Li and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05061095 (Understanding What Matters Most to Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05061095 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Understanding What Matters Most to Patients: Establishing the Validity of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey

TypeobservationalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled51ConditionsHematologic NeoplasmsArmsAssessment Surveys, Qualitative Interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quality of end-of-life care in patients with hematological malignancies: potential role of palliative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Palliative Care in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The relationship between emotional well-being and understanding of prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Areej El-JawahriMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ael-jawahri@partners.org.
Margaret Nelson-LoweMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harry VanDusenMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lara TraegerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gregory A AbelHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joseph A GreerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amir FathiMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David P SteensmaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas W LeBlancDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Zhigang LiGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Daniel DeAngeloHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Martha WadleighHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gabriela HobbsMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia FosterMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew BrunnerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Philip AmreinMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Richard M StoneHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer S TemelMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

TYROSINE KINASE ONCOGENESIS IN MYELOID LEUKEMIAP01CA066996 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI MATTHEW S DAVIDS · 1996 to 2026
$52.5M
Relation Between In-utero Vitamin D and Immune Function in Early Childhood P20GM104416 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHRISTENSEN, BROCK CLARKE · 2013 to 2022
$23.7M
Targeting SYK Kinase in AMLP50CA206963 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ASTER, JON C. · 2017 to 2021
$10.6M
Optimizing Palliative and End of Life Care for Patients with CancerK24CA181253 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TEMEL, JENNIFER SUE · 2014 to 2018
$737k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA181253NCI NIH HHS P01 CA066996NCI NIH HHS P50 CA206963NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with "intensive" chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus "nonintensive" chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. However, studies of how these patients understand the risks and benefits of such treatments are lacking.

methodsWe conducted a longitudinal study of older patients newly diagnosed with AML assessing patients' (

resultsWe enrolled patients within 72 hours of initiating intensive (

conclusionOlder patients with AML overestimate the risks and benefits of treatment. Interventions to facilitate communication and enhance patients' understanding of the goals of therapy and treatment risk are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are confronted with challenging decisions regarding treatment with "intensive" chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus "nonintensive" chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. A clear understanding of the likely outcome and risks of the various treatment strategies is essential for these patients to make informed decisions about their care. This article reports that older patients with AML overestimate both the risks and benefits of treatment and have substantial misperceptions about their prognosis. Interventions to enhance patients' understanding of their prognosis and treatment risk are needed.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAcute myeloid leukemiaDecision makingPerception of prognosisPrognostic understandingTreatment risk

Identifiers

PMID30139841
PMCPMC6369944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.