Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30139442›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2018

Impact of Percutaneous Revascularization on Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease.

Christopher M Cook, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Amarjit Sethi, Gerald J Clesham, Kare H Tang, Sukhjinder S Nijjer, Paul A Kelly, John R Davies and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Exercise Recommendations for the Athlete With Coronary Artery Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  14. Application of the DILEMMA score to improve lesion selection for invasive physiological assessment.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M CookImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yousif AhmadImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
James P HowardImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J Shun-ShinImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amarjit SethiImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gerald J CleshamEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.
Kare H TangEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Sukhjinder S NijjerImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul A KellyEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
John R DaviesEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.
Iqbal S MalikImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raffi KaprielianImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ghada MikhailImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ricardo PetracoImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Firas Al-JanabiEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.
Grigoris V KaramasisEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.
Shah MohdnazriEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.
Reto GammaEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Rasha Al-LameeImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas R KeebleEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom; Anglia Ruskin School of Medicine, Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom.
Jamil MayetImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sayan SenImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Darrel P FrancisImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Justin E DaviesImperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: drjustindavies@googlemail.com.
Imperial College London · GBEssex Cardiothoracic Centre · GBAnglia Ruskin University · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/10/38/28268British Heart Foundation FS/11/46/28861British Heart Foundation FS/14/27/30752Medical Research Council G1000357Medical Research Council G1100443Medical Research Council MR/M018369/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, the therapeutic benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been challenged in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCD).

objectivesThe authors examined the impact of PCI on exercise responses in the coronary circulation, the microcirculation, and systemic hemodynamics in patients with SCD.

methodsA total of 21 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 8.4 years) with SCD and single-vessel coronary stenosis underwent cardiac catheterization. Pre-PCI, patients exercised on a supine ergometer until rate-limiting angina or exhaustion. Simultaneous trans-stenotic coronary pressure-flow measurements were made throughout exercise. Post-PCI, this process was repeated. Physiological parameters, rate-limiting symptoms, and exercise performance were compared between pre-PCI and post-PCI exercise cycles.

resultsPCI reduced ischemia as documented by fractional flow reserve value (pre-PCI 0.59 ± 0.18 to post-PCI 0.91 ± 0.07), instantaneous wave-free ratio value (pre-PCI 0.61 ± 0.27 to post-PCI 0.96 ± 0.05) and coronary flow reserve value (pre-PCI 1.7 ± 0.7 to post-PCI 3.1 ± 1.0; p < 0.001 for all). PCI increased peak-exercise average peak coronary flow velocity (p < 0.0001), coronary perfusion pressure (distal coronary pressure; p < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.01), accelerating wave energy (p < 0.001), and myocardial workload (rate-pressure product; p < 0.01). These changes observed immediately following PCI resulted from the abolition of stenosis resistance (p < 0.0001). PCI was also associated with an immediate improvement in exercise time (+67 s; 95% confidence interval: 31 to 102 s; p < 0.0001) and a reduction in rate-limiting angina symptoms (81% reduction in rate-limiting angina symptoms post-PCI; p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn patients with SCD and severe single-vessel stenosis, objective physiological responses to exercise immediately normalize following PCI. This is seen in the coronary circulation, the microcirculation, and systemic hemodynamics.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedCohort StudiesCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationExerciseExercise ToleranceFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle Agedcoronary physiologyexercisepercutaneous coronary interventionstable coronary disease

Identifiers

PMID30139442
PMCPMC6580361
OpenAlexW2887997305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.