Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30139342›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Screening and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in antenatal and labor and delivery services: findings from cross-sectional observation studies in six sub-Saharan African countries.

Barbara Rawlins, Marya Plotkin, Jean Pierre Rakotovao, Ashebir Getachew, Maria Vaz, Jim Ricca, Pam Lynam, Frank Kagema, Patricia Gomez

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara RawlinsJhpiego, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Marya PlotkinJhpiego, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. Marya.plotkin@jhpiego.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7861-5369
Jean Pierre RakotovaoJhpiego Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Ashebir GetachewGandhi Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Maria VazJhpiego Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
Jim RiccaJhpiego, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Pam LynamJhpiego, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Frank KagemaKenyatta Referral and Teaching Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Patricia GomezJhpiego, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Grupo João Ferreira dos Santos (Mozambique) · MZMarymount University · US

Funding

USAID Leader with Associate Award A-00-08-00002-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreeclampsia and eclampsia (PE/E) are major contributors to maternal and neonatal deaths in developing countries, associated with 10-15% of direct maternal deaths and nearly a quarter of stillbirths and newborn deaths, many of which are preventable with improved care. We present results related to WHO-recommended interventions for screening and management of PE/E during antenatal care (ANC) and labor and delivery (L & D) from a study conducted in six sub-Saharan African countries.

methodsFrom 2010 to 2012, cross-sectional studies which directly observed provision of ANC and L & D services in six sub-Saharan African countries were conducted. Results from 643 health facilities of different levels in Ethiopia (n = 19), Kenya (n = 509), Madagascar (n = 36), Mozambique (n = 46), Rwanda (n = 72), and Tanzania (n = 52), were combined for this analysis. While studies were sampled separately in each country, all used standardized observation checklists and inventory assessment tools.

results2920 women receiving ANC and 2689 women in L & D were observed. Thirty-nine percent of ANC clients were asked about PE/E danger signs, and 68% had their blood pressure (BP) taken correctly (range 48-96%). Roughly half (46%) underwent testing for proteinuria. Twenty-three percent of women in L & D were asked about PE/E danger signs (range 11-34%); 77% had their BP checked upon admission (range 59-85%); and 6% had testing for proteinuria. Twenty-five cases of severe PE/E were observed: magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) was used in 15, not used in 5, and for 5 use was unknown. The availability of MgSO4 in L & D varied from 16% in Ethiopia to 100% in Mozambique.

conclusionsObserved ANC consultations and L & D cases showed low use of WHO-recommended practices for PE/E screening and management. Availability of MgSO4 was low in multiple countries, though it was on the essential drug list of all surveyed countries. Country programs are encouraged to address gaps in screening and management of PE/E in ANC and L & D to contribute to lower maternal and perinatal mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAfrica South of the SaharaAnticonvulsantsCross-Sectional StudiesEclampsiaFemaleHumansMagnesium SulfateMass ScreeningPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsMagnesium SulfateAntenatal careEclampsiaEthiopiaKenyaLabor and deliveryMozambiquePre-eclampsiaQuality of careRwandaTanzaniaZanzibar

Identifiers

PMID30139342
PMCPMC6108136
OpenAlexW2888244232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.