Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30139278›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2018

Variations in drug-related problems detected by multidisciplinary teams in Norwegian nursing homes and home nursing care.

Siri A Devik, Rose Mari Olsen, Inger Lise Fiskvik, Terje Halbostad, Tone Lassen, Natalia Kuzina, Ingela Enmarker

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Siri A Devika Centre of Care Research Mid-Norway , Steinkjer , Norway.
Rose Mari Olsenb Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences , Nord University , Namsos , Norway.
Inger Lise Fiskvikc Centre for Development of Institutional and Home care Services in Nord- Trøndelag , Stjørdal , Norway.
Terje Halbostadd Namsos Hospital , Hospital Pharmacy , Namsos , Norway.
Tone Lassene Apotek 1 , Malvik , Norway.
Natalia Kuzinaf Department of Laboratory Medicine Children's and women's Health , Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway.
Ingela Enmarkera Centre of Care Research Mid-Norway , Steinkjer , Norway.
Nord University · NONamsos Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Gävle · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTraditionally, nursing homes have been associated with suboptimal drug therapy and drug-related problems (DRPs). In contrast, less is known about drug safety in homecare. The aim of this study was to describe and compare DRPs in older persons across two care settings: nursing homes and home nursing care.

designCross-sectional study using descriptive and inferential statistics.

settingNursing homes (n = 5) and home nursing care units (n = 8) across nine municipalities in the middle of Norway.

participantsMultidisciplinary medication reviews for 61 nursing home residents and 93 patients receiving home nursing care performed over the 2013-2014 period, were mapped and examined (N = 154).

main outcome measuresDRPs classified by a Norwegian Classification Tool.

resultsIn all, 740 DRPs were detected in the total sample, 227 in nursing homes and 513 in home nursing care. DRPs were significantly higher among patients receiving home-based care (Mean =5.5) compared to patients in nursing homes (Mean =3.7, p = 0.002). Among the problem categories, the need for additional drug was most frequent in nursing homes (p = 0.001), while documentation discrepancies reached the highest numbers in patients receiving home nursing care (p = 0.000). Additionally, patients in home nursing care had more problems concerning adverse reactions (p = 0.060); however, this was not statistically significant. Differences in DRP categories leading to changes in the patients' medication lists were also discovered.

conclusionsThe frequency of unclear documentation and adverse reactions found in the homecare setting is alarming. This is an important issue given the trend in aged care towards caring people in their own homes. Further research is warranted to explore how different care settings may influence the safety of pharmacotherapy for older persons. Key Points Drug related problems are a significant cause of concern among patients receiving home nursing care as well as for patients living in nursing homes. The findings of this study showed that: •Significantly more DRPs were detected among patients receiving home nursing care than patients living in nursing homes. •While patients living in nursing homes were often undermedicated, documentation discrepancies were more frequent in home nursing care. •DRP categories leading to changes on the medication lists differed between the settings.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHome NursingHomes for the AgedNursing HomesPatient SafetyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDocumentationDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleNorwaycross-sectional studyDrug safetymedication reviewNorwegian Classification Tool for DRPsolder patientsprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID30139278
PMCPMC6381529
OpenAlexW2888291153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.