Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30139266›Full record

ArticleCartilage2020

Comparison of Electrophysiological Properties and Gene Expression between Human Chondrocytes and Chondroprogenitors Derived from Normal and Osteoarthritic Cartilage.

Upasana Kachroo, Abel Livingston, Elizabeth Vinod, Solomon Sathishkumar, P R J V C Boopalan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Upasana KachrooDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-8312
Abel LivingstonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Elizabeth VinodDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-8320
Solomon SathishkumarDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
P R J V C BoopalanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Christian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and chondrocytes are currently used for cell-based therapy in cartilage repair. Chondroprogenitors (CPs), resident cells of articular cartilage, demonstrate likeness to stem cells. Reports suggest that chondrocytes phenotype is altered in culture, thus making differentiation between the two cell populations difficult. Our objectives were to electrophysiologically assess chondrocytes and CPs, compare their mRNA expression with that of ionic channels already reported in MSCs, and to observe the effect of time in culture and osteoarthritic damage on cells. DESIGN AND

resultsChondrocytes and CPs at passages 0 (p0) and 5 (p5) derived from normal and osteoarthritic (OA) knee joints were used. Ionic currents were recorded by subjecting cells to depolarizing voltage pulses, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used for studying ion channel expression. Our results demonstrated that both chondrocytes and CPs showed the presence of similar currents belonging to voltage-gated potassium channel subfamily, with RT-PCR confirming high mRNA expression of Maxi K, HKv1.1, HKv1.4, HKv4.2, and hEAG1 channels. Our finding also suggested that CPs were comparatively more sensitive to increased time in culture and inflammatory processes as observed in OA, as was evidenced by the significant decrease in mean current density (p0 normal CP: 183.171 ± 50.80 pA/pF; p5 normal CP: 50.225 ± 17.63 pA/pF;

conclusionBoth cell types appear to be optimal candidates for cell-based therapy although initial seeding density, cell source (normal vs. OA), and time in culture are matters of concern, prior to cell-type selection.

Indexed as

AdultCartilage, ArticularCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondrogenesisElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleGene ExpressionHumansKnee JointMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoarthritisRNA, MessengerStem CellsRNA, MessengerchondrocyteschondroprogenitorselectrophysiologyosteoarthritisRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID30139266
PMCPMC7298598
OpenAlexW2888333643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.