Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138922›Full record

ArticleGerontology2018

Cognitive Impairment, Sexual Activity and Physical Tenderness in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Exploration.

Rosanne Freak-Poli, Silvan Licher, Joanne Ryan, M Arfan Ikram, Henning Tiemeier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Touch in the era of the coronavirus pandemic.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020
    Article
  14. It's not age that prevents sexual activity later in life.Australasian journal on ageing · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosanne Freak-PoliDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Silvan LicherDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Joanne RyanDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Henning TiemeierDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to engage in sexual activity and better cognitive functioning are both associated with better health. However, the association between cognitive functioning and sexual activity is understudied.

objectiveTo examine the association between cognitive functioning with sexual activity and physical tenderness among community-dwelling older adults.

methodsFrom the Rotterdam Study, cognitive impairment and sexual activity were assessed in 4,201 community-dwelling, 60+ year olds between 2008 and 2014 in the Netherlands. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was based upon subjective complaints related to age and education-adjusted test scores. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) impairment was defined by a score of < 26. Sexual activity and physical tenderness (e.g., fondling or kissing) in the last 6 months were assessed at an interview. Analyses were stratified by gender and partner status, with prevalence rates for the "no impairment" categories weighted based on age from the cognitive impairment categories. Inter-rater reliability was examined utilising 74 cohabiting couples of opposite gender.

resultsIt was found that 14% were categorised as having cognitive impairment, and < 1% as dementia (excluded from subsequent analyses). There was strong evidence that the odds of engaging in physical tenderness (observed through MMSE < 26, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.32-3.48, p = 0.002) and sexual activity (MCI, OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.35-4.12, p = 0.003) among partnered females with no impairment was twice that observed among cognitively impaired partnered females. There was weak evidence that the odds of engaging in physical tenderness (MMSE < 26, OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.04-2.42, p = 0.03) and sexual activity (MMSE < 26, OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.24, p = 0.04) among partnered males with no impairment was 50% greater than observed among cognitively impaired partnered males. The associations between cognitive functioning and physical tenderness continued to remain after adjustment for physical function, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. There was no clear evidence of a difference between amnestic and non-amnestic MCI for sexual behaviour. There was moderate to substantial agreement among the coupled adults who had 1 partner categorised with MCI.

conclusionHaving no cognitive impairment was associated with more engagement in sexual activity and physical tenderness among community-dwelling older adults. Sexuality is an important aspect of active aging and our findings illustrate a potential barrier to maintaining or instigating intimate relationships as we age. Longitudinal analyses are required to explore the direction of effect.

Indexed as

AgingCognitionCognitive DysfunctionSexual BehaviorAgedEducational StatusFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Status DisparitiesHumansIndependent LivingMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrevalenceAgedAgingGeriatricsSex factorsSexual behaviourSexualitySexual partnersTouch

Identifiers

PMID30138922
PMCPMC6262681
OpenAlexW2888358179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.