Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138791›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018

The effect of quinine in two bottle choice procedures in C57BL6 mice: Opioid preference, somatic withdrawal, and pharmacokinetic outcomes.

Travis W Grim, Scarlet Jinhong Park, Cullen L Schmid, Robert B Laprairie, Michael Cameron, Laura M Bohn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Novel Morphine Drinking Model of Opioid Dependence in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Absolute ethanol intake predicts ethanol preference inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Travis W GrimThe Scripps Research Institute, 110 Scripps Way, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. Electronic address: tgrim@scripps.edu.
Scarlet Jinhong ParkThe Scripps Research Institute, 110 Scripps Way, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. Electronic address: jpark@scripps.edu.
Cullen L SchmidThe Scripps Research Institute, 110 Scripps Way, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. Electronic address: cschmid@scripps.edu.
Robert B LaprairieThe Scripps Research Institute, 110 Scripps Way, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. Electronic address: rbl826@mail.usask.ca.
Michael CameronThe Scripps Research Institute, 110 Scripps Way, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. Electronic address: mcameron@scripps.edu.
Laura M BohnThe Scripps Research Institute, 110 Scripps Way, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. Electronic address: lbohn@scripps.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Biasing Mu Opioid Receptor Signaling in vivoR01DA038964 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Laura M. Bohn · 2015 to 2026
$4.6M
Structure and Function of CB2 ReceptorR01DA045020 · NIDA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BOHN, LAURA M., KATRITCH, VSEVOLOD · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
Rational discovery of new DOR chemotypes to prevent addiction and overdoseR21DA038858 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KATRITCH, VSEVOLOD · 2015 to 2016
$410k
Rational Anthrax Vaccine with Structural Epitopes on VLPR43AI052969 · NIAID · PLEXUS VACCINE · PI KATRITCH, VSEVOLOD · 2002 to 2002
$98k
NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI052969NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038964NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045020NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous reports assessing morphine effects in two bottle choice (TBC) paradigms often use taste adulterants such as sweeteners (e.g., saccharin) and/or bitterants (e.g., quinine) to demonstrate morphine preference with C57BL6 mice. The effect of these additional components on the morphine preference of C57BL6 remains poorly understood. Thus, we sought to elucidate the interrelationship of morphine and quinine in the TBC paradigm. As expected, when morphine was included in the opposite bottle from quinine, a preference for the morphine solution was observed. Conversely, when quinine was included in each bottle, or when fentanyl without quinine was used, no preference was observed. All opioid-drinking mice displayed withdrawal signs, and morphine was detectable in plasma and brain. When these results were compared to previous results via conversion to quinine preference scores, quinine was revealed to determine largely the measured morphine preference. Thus, quinine is effective to drive morphine consumption and engender dependence but may confound the ability to measure oral abuse liability of morphine. Together, these results suggest future TBC procedures should consider the effect of quinine upon measured preference for compounds in the opposite bottle, and that excessively high quinine concentrations appear to influence preference more so than the opposite solute when using C57BL6 mice. Alternative conditions to assess oral abuse liability may be necessary to complement and confirm results from TBC experiments utilizing morphine or other opioids.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsBrainChoice BehaviorMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorphineQuinineSaccharinSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTasteAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineQuinineSaccharinAbuse liabilityDependenceMorphineOpioidPharmacokineticsQuinineTwo bottle choice

Identifiers

PMID30138791
PMCPMC6317844
OpenAlexW2886948156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.