Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138590›Full record

ArticleNeuron2018

A Dynamic Interplay within the Frontoparietal Network Underlies Rhythmic Spatial Attention.

Ian C Fiebelkorn, Mark A Pinsk, Sabine Kastner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Shared Theta-Rhythmic Process for Selective Sampling of Environmental Information and Internally Stored Information.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian C FiebelkornPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: iancf@princeton.edu.
Mark A PinskPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Sabine KastnerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Michael Peter Milham · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Functions of the Thalamus in Perception and CognitionR01EY017699 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SABINE KASTNER · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
Neural mechanisms of attentionR01MH064043 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KASTNER, SABINE, KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
Attention network dynamics in the primate brainR21EY023565 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KASTNER, SABINE, KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2014 to 2015
$454k
Neural Correlates of spatial and object-based selectionF32EY023465 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI FIEBELKORN, IAN C. · 2013 to 2015
$165k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY023465NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017699NEI NIH HHS R21 EY023565NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic studies of spatial attention assumed that its neural and behavioral effects were continuous over time. Recent behavioral studies have instead revealed that spatial attention leads to alternating periods of heightened or diminished perceptual sensitivity. Yet, the neural basis of these rhythmic fluctuations has remained largely unknown. We show that a dynamic interplay within the macaque frontoparietal network accounts for the rhythmic properties of spatial attention. Neural oscillations characterize functional interactions between the frontal eye fields (FEF) and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), with theta phase (3-8 Hz) coordinating two rhythmically alternating states. The first is defined by FEF-dominated beta-band activity, associated with suppressed attentional shifts, and LIP-dominated gamma-band activity, associated with enhanced visual processing and better behavioral performance. The second is defined by LIP-specific alpha-band activity, associated with attenuated visual processing and worse behavioral performance. Our findings reveal how network-level interactions organize environmental sampling into rhythmic cycles.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAttentionFrontal LobeMacaca fascicularisMaleNerve NetParietal LobePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceTheta RhythmattentionFEFfrontoparietal networkLIPoscillationsphase-dependent behaviorthetavision

Identifiers

PMID30138590
PMCPMC6474777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.