Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138483›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Re-annotation of 12,495 prokaryotic 16S rRNA 3' ends and analysis of Shine-Dalgarno and anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequences.

Mohammad Ruhul Amin, Alisa Yurovsky, Yuping Chen, Steve Skiena, Bruce Futcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contrasting Genetic Diversity ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Three Phages One Host: Isolation and Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Simplification of Ribosomes in Bacteria with Tiny Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Ruhul AminDept. of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Alisa YurovskyDept. of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Yuping ChenDept. of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9819-0230
Steve SkienaDept. of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
Bruce FutcherDept. of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1012-9022
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

Encoding biases and their effects on translation, quality control and gene expressionR01GM119175 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FUTCHER, BRUCE BRUCE · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined 20,648 prokaryotic unique taxids with respect to the annotation of the 3' end of the 16S rRNA, which contains the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence. We used the sequence of highly conserved helix 45 of the 16S rRNA as a guide. By this criterion, 8,153 annotated 3' ends correctly included the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence, but 12,495 were foreshortened or otherwise mis-annotated, missing part or all of the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence, which immediately follows helix 45. We re-annotated, giving a total of 20,648 16S rRNA 3' ends. The vast majority indeed contained a consensus anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence, embedded in a highly conserved 13 base "tail". However, 128 exceptional organisms had either a variant anti-Shine-Dalgarno, or no recognizable anti-Shine-Dalgarno, in their 16S rRNA(s). For organisms both with and without an anti-Shine-Dalgarno, we identified the Shine-Dalgarno motifs actually enriched in front of each organism's open reading frames. This showed to what extent the Shine-Dalgarno motifs correlated with anti-Shine Dalgarno motifs. In general, organisms whose rRNAs lacked a perfect anti-Shine-Dalgarno motif also lacked a recognizable Shine-Dalgarno. For organisms whose 16S rRNAs contained a perfect anti-Shine-Dalgarno motif, a variety of results were obtained. We found one genus, Alteromonas, where several taxids apparently maintain two different types of 16S rRNA genes, with different, but conserved, antiSDs. The fact that some organisms do not seem to have or use Shine-Dalgarno motifs supports the idea that prokaryotes have other robust mechanisms for recognizing start codons for translation.

Indexed as

3' Flanking RegionBase SequenceCodon, InitiatorEukaryotaMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCodon, InitiatorRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30138483
PMCPMC6107228
OpenAlexW2888116354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.