Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

DIY HIV prevention: Formative qualitative research with men who have sex with men who source PrEP outside of clinical trials.

Sara Paparini, Will Nutland, Tim Rhodes, Vinh-Kim Nguyen, Jane Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Somatechnics · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara PapariniDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology of Development, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-2481
Will NutlandDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, Faculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Tim RhodesDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, Faculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Vinh-Kim NguyenDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology of Development, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jane AndersonHomerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-8707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral medication is an effective, evidence-based option for HIV prevention. In England, issues of cost-effectiveness and of responsibility for commissioning prevention services have so far led National Health Service (NHS) England to decide not to commission PrEP. Given the significant lag between the awareness of PrEP efficacy and the opportunity to obtain PrEP through traditional health care routes, many gay and other men who have sex with men (MSM) have turned to 'DIY PrEP', purchasing generic formulations of PrEP for themselves on the internet or via other alternative routes. However, there is very little research on DIY PrEP practices and no qualitative study with DIY PrEP users in the UK. A formative qualitative study was conducted in 2017 to inform the development of an intervention (PrEP Club) to support DIY PrEP users and improve the safety and experience of this prevention strategy. Focus groups were held with 20 MSM who are based in London and are obtaining PrEP through means other than clinical trials, to explore their accounts of sourcing and using PrEP and the experiential meanings of these. In this article, we report findings from this first, formative study and present the different practices involved in finding out about PrEP, buying it and ascertaining legitimacy of sellers and products. We reflect on the uncertainties participants described related to actually using PrEP, including deciding on drug dosing and monitoring their health. Finally, we present the results of the discussions participants had about the kind of support they had received, the help they would have liked, and their views on proposed interventions to support DIY PrEP users, such as PrEP Club.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisSelf MedicationSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSelf-Help GroupsAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID30138482
PMCPMC6107262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.