Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138408›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2018

Asymmetric antiviral effects of ebolavirus antibodies targeting glycoprotein stem and glycan cap.

Philipp A Ilinykh, Rodrigo I Santos, Bronwyn M Gunn, Natalia A Kuzmina, Xiaoli Shen, Kai Huang, Pavlo Gilchuk, Andrew I Flyak, Patrick Younan, Galit Alter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential requirements for FcγR engagement by protective antibodies against Ebola virus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp A IlinykhDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
Rodrigo I SantosDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
Bronwyn M GunnVanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Natalia A KuzminaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6650-9369
Xiaoli ShenDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
Kai HuangDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3373-5594
Pavlo GilchukVanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Andrew I FlyakDepartments of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Patrick YounanDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
Galit AlterRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
James E CroweVanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-1079
Alexander BukreyevDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0342-4824
Galveston College · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Supplemental Research Project (SRP)U19AI109711 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GEISBERT, THOMAS WILLIAM · 2014 to 2018
$26.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that some monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for ebolavirus glycoprotein (GP) can protect experimental animals against infections. Most mAbs isolated from ebolavirus survivors appeared to target the glycan cap or the stalk region of the viral GP, which is the envelope protein and the only antigen inducing virus-neutralizing antibody response. Some of the mAbs were demonstrated to be protective in vivo. Here, a panel of mAbs from four individual survivors of ebolavirus infection that target the glycan cap or stem region were selected for investigation of the mechanisms of their antiviral effect. Comparative characterization of the inhibiting effects on multiple steps of viral replication was performed, including attachment, post-attachment, entry, binding at low pH, post-cleavage neutralization of virions, viral trafficking to endosomes, cell-to-cell transmission, viral egress, and inhibition when added early at various time points post-infection. In addition, Fc-domain related properties were characterized, including activation and degranulation of NK cells, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis and glycan content. The two groups of mAbs (glycan cap versus stem) demonstrated very different profiles of activities suggesting usage of mAbs with different epitope specificity could coordinate inhibition of multiple steps of filovirus infection through Fab- and Fc-mediated mechanisms, and provide a reliable therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralEbolavirusHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansViral Envelope ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30138408
PMCPMC6107261
OpenAlexW2888150077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.