Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138396›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A comparative study of structural, functional and circulatory parameters in glaucoma diagnostics.

Natalia Ivanovna Kurysheva, Ekaterina Vladimirovna Maslova, Inna Vladimirovna Zolnikova, Alexey Valentinovich Fomin, Mikhail Borisovich Lagutin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Directional kinetics analysis of the progression of geographic atrophy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Ivanovna KuryshevaConsultative-Diagnostic Department of Ophthalmology Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation, A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical and Biophysical Center of FMBA, Ophthalmological Department of the Institute of Improvement of Professional Skill of FMBA, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-6671
Ekaterina Vladimirovna MaslovaConsultative-Diagnostic Department of Ophthalmology Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation, A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical and Biophysical Center of FMBA, Ophthalmological Department of the Institute of Improvement of Professional Skill of FMBA, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Inna Vladimirovna ZolnikovaMoscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexey Valentinovich FominNational Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Mikhail Borisovich LagutinLomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Department of Mathematical Statistics and Stochastic Processes, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of structural parameters, vessel density (VD) measured by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and electrophysiological testing in diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

methods35 healthy participants and 90 POAG subjects underwent the measurement of whole image en face (wi) VD in the disc/peripapillary region and macula, the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and the average thickness of ganglion cell complex (GCC), pattern electroretinograms and pattern visual evoked potentials. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed for each parameter to differentiate early POAG from healthy eyes and between the POAG stages.

resultsTo distinguish early POAG from healthy eyes, the parameters with the highest AUC were detected: P50 amplitude of transient pattern electroretinogram, 1° (AUC 0.93, p = 0.002), P1 component of steady-state pattern electroretinogram (AUC 0.92, p = 0.003), P100 amplitude of pattern visual evoked potential, 1° (AUC 0.84, p = 0.013), wiVD macula superficial (AUC 0.80, p = 0.001), wiVD Disc (AUC 0.74, p = 0.016), GCC (AUC 0.74, p = 0.016) and to distinguish early POAG from the moderate to severe POAG: inferotemporal peripapillary VD (AUC 0.94, p < 0.0001) and focal loss volume of GCC (AUC 0.92, p < 0, 001).

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the importance of measuring the microcirculation parameters in the macular area along with PERGs and PVEPs for the early detection of glaucoma. VD in the inferotemporal sector of the peripapillary retina and focal loss volume of the GCC are important for monitoring of the disease. The inclusion of OCTA, PERGs and PVEPs in glaucoma diagnostics may improve its early detection and monitoring.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualAgedArea Under CurveComputed Tomography AngiographyEarly DiagnosisElectrophysiological PhenomenaElectroretinographyEyeFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID30138396
PMCPMC6107119
OpenAlexW2888766434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.