ArticlePloS one2018
Validation of the Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) score in an East Asian population.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Predictive Models of Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Survey of the Current Science and Analysis of Model Performances.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of return of spontaneous circulation prediction scores in patients with cardiac arrest during ambulance transport.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Validation of CASPRI, GO-FAR, PIHCA scores in predicting favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest; A five-year three center retrospective study in IRAN.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Critical care explorations · 2024Observational
- Predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: CASPRI and GO-FAR scores.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Resuscitation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical features and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in code blue events: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial neural network-boosted Cardiac Arrest Survival Post-Resuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) score accurately predicts outcome in cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-Hospital (CASPRI) Score Predicts Neurological Favorable Survival in Emergency Department Cardiac Arrest.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- A retrospective study on the therapeutic effects of sodium bicarbonate for adult in-hospital cardiac arrest.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Long-Term Outcomes After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Does Pre-arrest Skeletal Muscle Depletion Matter?Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- A novel methodological framework for multimodality, trajectory model-based prognostication.Resuscitation · 2019Article
- In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review.JAMA · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) score is a useful tool for predicting neurological outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and was derived from a cohort selected from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry between 2000 and 2009 in the United States. In an East Asian population, we aimed to identify the factors associated with outcomes of resuscitated IHCA patients and assess the validity of the CASPRI score.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted in a single centre in Taiwan. Patients with IHCA between 2006 and 2014 were screened.
resultsAmong the 796 included patients, 94 (11.8%) patients achieved neurologically intact survival. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified factors significantly associated with neurological outcome. Six of these factors were also components of the CASPRI score, including duration of resuscitation, neurological status before IHCA, malignant disease, initial arrest rhythms, renal insufficiency and age. In univariate logistic regression analysis, the CASPRI score was significantly associated with neurological outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-0.87); the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84).
conclusionIn this retrospective study conducted in a single centre at Taiwan, we identified the common prognosticators of IHCA shared by both East Asian and Western societies. As a composite prognosticator, CASPRI score predicts outcomes with excellent accuracy among successfully resuscitated IHCA patients in an East Asian population. This tool allows accurate IHCA prognostication in an East Asian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.