ArticlePloS one2018
Estimating uterine source current during contractions using magnetomyography measurements.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite element modeling in obstetrics and gynecology: advances, applications, and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Directional Sensors for Recording Uterine EMG During Pregnancy.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Neuromuscular Magnetic Field Measurement Based on Superconducting Bio-Sensors.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessing uterine electrophysiology prior to elective term induction of labor.Current research in physiology · 2023Article
- Noninvasive muscle activity imaging using magnetography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Accuracy of electromyometrial imaging of uterine contractions in clinical environment.Computers in biology and medicine · 2020Article
- Electro-Mechanical Ionic Channel Modeling for Uterine Contractions and Oxytocin Effect during Pregnancy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- On the prediction of premature births in Hispanic labour patients using uterine contractions, heart beat signals and prediction machines.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the uterine source of the electrophysiological activity of contractions during pregnancy is of scientific interest and potential clinical applications. In this work, we propose a method to estimate uterine source currents from magnetomyography (MMG) temporal course measurements on the abdominal surface. In particular, we develop a linear forward model, based on the quasistatic Maxwell's equations and a realistic four-compartment volume conductor, relating the magnetic fields to the source currents on the uterine surface through a lead-field matrix. To compute the lead-field matrix, we use a finite element method that considers the anisotropic property of the myometrium. We estimate the source currents by minimizing a constrained least-squares problem to solve the non-uniqueness issue of the inverse problem. Because we lack the ground truth of the source current, we propose to predict the intrauterine pressure from our estimated source currents by using an absolute-value-based method and compare the result with real abdominal deflection recorded during contractile activity. We test the feasibility of the lead-field matrix by displaying the lead fields that are generated by putative source currents at different locations in the myometrium: cervix and fundus, left and right, front and back. We then illustrate our method by using three synthetic MMG data sets, which are generated using our previously developed multiscale model of uterine contractions, and three real MMG data sets, one of which has simultaneous real abdominal deflection measurements. The numerical results demonstrate the ability of our method to capture the local contractile activity of human uterus during pregnancy. Moreover, the predicted intrauterine pressure is in fair agreement with the real abdominal deflection with respect to the timing of uterine contractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.