Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Molecular epidemiology of cattle tuberculosis in Mexico through whole-genome sequencing and spoligotyping.

Claudia Angélica Perea Razo, Elba Rodríguez Hernández, Sergio Iván Román Ponce, Feliciano Milián Suazo, Suelee Robbe-Austerman, Tod Stuber, Germinal Jorge Cantó Alarcón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Molecular typing and drug sensitivity profiles ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Mexican Strains ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genomic and temporal analyses ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Whole Genome Sequencing LinksFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  12. Epidemiology of Pig Tuberculosis in Argentina.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  13. Microbial genomics · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Global Distribution and Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia Angélica Perea RazoDoctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Qro., México.
Elba Rodríguez HernándezCentro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal, INIFAP, Colón, Qro., México.
Sergio Iván Román PonceCentro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal, INIFAP, Colón, Qro., México.ORCID 0000-0002-6704-6578
Feliciano Milián SuazoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Qro., México.
Suelee Robbe-AustermanNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, United States Department of Agriculture, University Blvd, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Tod StuberNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, United States Department of Agriculture, University Blvd, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Germinal Jorge Cantó AlarcónFacultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Qro., México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle persists in Mexico, posing a threat to human health. Control of bovine tuberculosis, through the National Program Against Bovine Tuberculosis, has led to the decrease of disease prevalence in most of the country, except for high dairy production regions. Genotyping of M. bovis has been performed mainly by spoligotyping and variable number tandem repeats (VNTR), but higher resolution power can be useful for a finer definition of the spread of the disease. Whole genome sequencing and spoligotyping was performed for a set of 322 M. bovis isolates from different sources in Mexico: Baja California, Coahuila, Estado de Mexico, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Queretaro and Veracruz, from dairy and beef cattle, as well as humans. Twelve main genetic clades were obtained through WGS and genetic diversity analysis. A clear differentiation of the Baja California isolates was seen as they clustered together exclusively. However, isolates from the central states showed no specific clustering whatsoever. Although WGS proves to have higher resolving power than spoligotyping, and since there was concordance between WGS and spoligotyping results, we consider that the latter is still an efficient and practical method for monitoring bovine tuberculosis in developing countries, where resources for higher technology are scarce.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesGenome, BacterialWhole Genome SequencingAnimalsCattleEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationMexicoMolecular EpidemiologyMycobacterium bovisPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTuberculosis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID30138365
PMCPMC6107157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.