Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138354›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Measuring social integration and tie strength with smartphone and survey data.

Agnete S Dissing, Cynthia M Lakon, Thomas A Gerds, Naja H Rod, Rikke Lund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnete S DissingSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5968-1670
Cynthia M LakonProgram in Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Thomas A GerdsSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Naja H RodSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Rikke LundSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recordings of smartphone use for contacts are increasingly being used as alternative or supplementary measurement methods for social interactions and social relations in the health sciences. Less work has been done to understand how these measures compare with widely used survey-based information. Using data from the Copenhagen Network Study, we investigated whether derived survey and smartphone measures on two widely studied concepts; Social integration and Tie strength were associated. The study population included 737 college students (mean age 21.6 years, Standard deviation: 2.6), who were followed with surveys and continuous recordings of smartphone usage over a one-month period. We derived self-reported and smartphone measures of social integration (social role diversity, social network size), and tie strength (contact frequency, duration and tie reciprocity). Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between smartphone derived and self-reported measures adjusting for gender, age and co-habitation. Larger call and text message networks were associated with having a high self-reported social role diversity, and a high self-reported social contact frequency was likewise associated with having both frequent call and text message interactions, longer call duration and a higher level of reciprocity in call and text message communication. Self-reported aspects of social relations and smartphone measures of social interactions have considerable overlap supporting a measurement of similar underlying concepts.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSmartphoneSocial NetworkingAdultFemaleHumansMaleSelf ReportSocial BehaviorStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30138354
PMCPMC6107109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.