Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Dynamic inking of large-scale stamps for multiplexed microcontact printing and fabrication of cell microarrays.

Julie Foncy, Aurore Estève, Amélie Degache, Camille Colin, Xavier Dollat, Jean-Christophe Cau, Christophe Vieu, Emmanuelle Trévisiol, Laurent Malaquin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Engineered Tools to Study Intercellular Communication.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julie FoncyLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.
Aurore EstèveLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.
Amélie DegacheInnopsys, Parc d'activités Activestre, Carbonne, France.
Camille ColinLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.
Xavier DollatLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Christophe CauInnopsys, Parc d'activités Activestre, Carbonne, France.
Christophe VieuLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.
Emmanuelle TrévisiolLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.
Laurent MalaquinLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-3352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcontact printing has become a versatile soft lithography technique used to produce molecular micro- and nano-patterns consisting of a large range of different biomolecules. Despite intensive research over the last decade and numerous applications in the fields of biosensors, microarrays and biomedical applications, the large-scale implementation of microcontact printing is still an issue. It is hindered by the stamp-inking step that is critical to ensure a reproducible and uniform transfer of inked molecules over large areas. This is particularly important when addressing application such as cell microarray manufacturing, which are currently used for a wide range of analytical and pharmaceutical applications. In this paper, we present a large-scale and multiplexed microcontact printing process of extracellular matrix proteins for the fabrication of cell microarrays. We have developed a microfluidic inking approach combined with a magnetic clamping technology that can be adapted to most standard substrates used in biology. We have demonstrated a significant improvement of homogeneity of printed protein patterns on surfaces larger than 1 cm2 through the control of both the flow rate and the wetting mechanism of the stamp surface during microfluidic inking. Thanks to the reproducibility and integration capabilities provided by microfluidics, we have achieved the printing of three different adhesion proteins in one-step transfer. Selective cell adhesion and cell shape adaptation on the produced patterns were observed, showing the suitability of this approach for producing on-demand large-scale cell microarrays.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCell AdhesionCell ShapeExtracellular Matrix ProteinsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPrintingTissue Array AnalysisExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30138342
PMCPMC6107178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.