Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Integrating screening for non-communicable diseases and their risk factors in routine tuberculosis care in Delhi, India: A mixed-methods study.

Tanu Anand, Jugal Kishore, Petros Isaakidis, Himanshu A Gupte, Gurmeet Kaur, Sneha Kumari, Diwakar Jha, Shekhar Grover

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanu AnandDepartment of Community Medicine, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2911-2332
Jugal KishoreDepartment of Community Medicine, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College & Safdurjung Hospital, Delhi, India.
Petros IsaakidisMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Research Unit, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Himanshu A GupteNarotam Sekhsaria Foundation, Mumbai, India.
Gurmeet KaurDepartment of Community Medicine, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.
Sneha KumariDepartment of Community Medicine, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College & Safdurjung Hospital, Delhi, India.
Diwakar JhaDepartment of Community Medicine, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India.
Shekhar GroverNational Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Hindu Rao Hospital · INVardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital · INHealis Sekhsaria Institute For Public Health · INMédecins Sans Frontières · LUNational Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence supports the integration of prevention and management for tuberculosis (TB) with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Bi-directional screening for TB and diabetes mellitus (DM) is already implemented in India, a country with a dual burden of TB and NCDs. However, very limited programmatic data are available on the feasibility of adding other NCDs and their risk factors in such screening programme.

objectiveTo assess the yield, feasibility, and acceptability of a two-stage integrated screening for NCDs and risk factors for NCDs among patients with TB ≥20 years and treated in DOTS centres of two medical colleges in Delhi, between October 2016 and March 2017.

methodsIt was a mixed-methods, triangulation study with a quantitative component (cross-sectional study using questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and records review) and a qualitative component (descriptive study using interview data).

resultsAmongst 403 patients screened, the prevalence of hypertension was 7% (n = 28) with 20 new cases detected and 8% for DM (n = 32) with 6 new cases diagnosed. The number needed to screen to find a new case was 20 and 63 for hypertension and DM respectively. The most frequent NCD-risk factors were inadequate vegetable (80%) and fruits (72%) intake, alcohol use (34%), use of smokeless tobacco (33%) and smoking (32%). Clustering of four or more risk factors was associated with increasing age and male sex (p<0.05). Both patients and health providers considered the screening relevant and acceptable. However, waiting time and costs involved in blood tests were considered as bothersome by the patients, while health providers perceived increased workload, inadequate medical supplies and inadequate skills and knowledge as key challenges in implementation of the screening.

conclusionIntegrating screening for NCDs and their risk factors in the existing TB programme produces high yield and it is feasible and acceptable by patients and health providers provided the challenges are overcome.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsCitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHematologic TestsHumansIndiaMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesPrevalenceProspective StudiesQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID30138331
PMCPMC6107155
OpenAlexW2888309849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.