Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138141›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2018

Typhoid and paratyphoid fever: a call to action.

Malick M Gibani, Carl Britto, Andrew J Pollard

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A defined microbiota mouse model forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Prevalence of the Antibiotic Resistance ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Bacteriophages againstFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Typhoid fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Nifuratel reducesMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  12. Antimicrobial potential of unstressed and heat stressedSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Malick M GibaniOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Carl Britto
Andrew J Pollard

Funding

Wellcome Trust 106158/ZZ/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEnteric fever remains a major global-health concern, estimated to be responsible for between 11.9 and 26.9 million cases annually. Long-term prevention of enteric fever will require improved access to safe drinking water combined with investment in sanitation and hygiene interventions. In the short-to-medium term, new control strategies for typhoid fever have arrived in the form of typhoid Vi-conjugate vaccines (TCVs), offering hope that disease control can be achieved in the near future. RECENT

findingsThe diagnosis of enteric fever is complicated by its nonspecific clinical presentation, coupled with the low sensitivity of commonly used diagnostics. Investment in diagnostics has the potential to improve management, to refine estimates of disease burden and to facilitate vaccine impact studies. A new generation of reliable, diagnostic tests is needed that are simultaneously accessible, cost-effective, sensitive, and specific. The emergence and global dissemination of multidrug-resistant, fluoroquinolone-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of Salmonella Typhi emphasizes the importance of continued surveillance and appropriate antibiotic stewardship, integrated into a global strategy to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Current empirical treatment guidelines are out of date and should be updated to respond to local trends in AMR, so as to guide treatment choices in the absence of robust diagnostics and laboratory facilities. In September 2017, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) immunization recommended the programmatic use of TCVs in high burden countries. Ongoing and future studies should aim to study the impact of these vaccines in a diverse range of setting and to support the deployment of TCVs in high-burden countries. SUMMARY: The advent of new generation TCVs offers us a practical and affordable public-health tool that - for the first time - can be integrated into routine childhood immunization programmes. In this review, we advocate for the deployment of TCVs in line with WHO recommendations, to improve child health and limit the spread of antibiotic-resistant S. Typhi.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCommunicable Disease ControlDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDisease Transmission, InfectiousDrug Resistance, BacterialEpidemiological MonitoringGlobal HealthHumansParatyphoid FeverTyphoid FeverTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsTyphoid-Paratyphoid Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30138141
PMCPMC6319573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.