Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30138057›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2018

Modeling Health Benefits and Harms of Public Policy Responses to the US Opioid Epidemic.

Allison L Pitt, Keith Humphreys, Margaret L Brandeau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
29.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Economic Evaluation in Opioid Modeling: Systematic Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison L PittAllison L. Pitt and Margaret L. Brandeau are with the Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Keith Humphreys is with the Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University.
Keith HumphreysAllison L. Pitt and Margaret L. Brandeau are with the Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Keith Humphreys is with the Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University.
Margaret L BrandeauAllison L. Pitt and Margaret L. Brandeau are with the Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Keith Humphreys is with the Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR01DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI OWENS, DOUGLAS K · 2002 to 2017
$9.4M
Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR37DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS K OWENS · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015612NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA015612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate health outcomes of policies to mitigate the opioid epidemic.

methodsWe used dynamic compartmental modeling of US adults, in various pain, opioid use, and opioid addiction health states, to project addiction-related deaths, life years, and quality-adjusted life years from 2016 to 2025 for 11 policy responses to the opioid epidemic.

resultsOver 5 years, increasing naloxone availability, promoting needle exchange, expanding medication-assisted addiction treatment, and increasing psychosocial treatment increased life years and quality-adjusted life years and reduced deaths. Other policies reduced opioid prescription supply and related deaths but led some addicted prescription users to switch to heroin use, which increased heroin-related deaths. Over a longer horizon, some such policies may avert enough new addiction to outweigh the harms. No single policy is likely to substantially reduce deaths over 5 to 10 years.

conclusionsPolicies focused on services for addicted people improve population health without harming any groups. Policies that reduce the prescription opioid supply may increase heroin use and reduce quality of life in the short term, but in the long term could generate positive health benefits. A portfolio of interventions will be needed for eventual mitigation.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionPublic PolicyDrug OverdoseHeroin DependenceHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNeedle-Exchange ProgramsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited StatesNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID30138057
PMCPMC6137764
OpenAlexW2888377253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.