Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137965›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2018

Quality Criteria for the Analysis of Microplastic in Biota Samples: A Critical Review.

Enya Hermsen, Svenja M Mintenig, Ellen Besseling, Albert A Koelmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microplastics in the Human Nasal Cavity and Upper Airway: Emerging Evidence and Rhinologic Implications.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Enya HermsenAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group , Wageningen University , Wageningen , The Netherlands.
Svenja M MintenigCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development , Utrecht University , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Ellen BesselingAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group , Wageningen University , Wageningen , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0686-2173
Albert A KoelmansAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group , Wageningen University , Wageningen , The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-4356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on ingestion of microplastics by marine biota are quintessential for monitoring and risk assessment of microplastics in the environment. Current studies, however, portray a wide spread in results on the occurrence of microplastic ingestion, highlighting a lack of comparability of results, which might be attributed to a lack of standardization of methods. We critically review and evaluate recent microplastic ingestion studies in aquatic biota, propose a quality assessment method for such studies, and apply the assessment method to the reviewed studies. The quality assessment method uses ten criteria: sampling method and strategy, sample size, sample processing and storage, laboratory preparation, clean air conditions, negative controls, positive controls, target component, sample (pre)treatment, and polymer identification. The results of this quality assessment show a dire need for stricter quality assurance in microplastic ingestion studies. On average, studies score 8.0 out of 20 points for "completeness of information" and 0 for "reliability". Alongside the assessment method, a standardized protocol for detecting microplastic in biota samples incorporating these criteria is provided.

Indexed as

PlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiotaEnvironmental MonitoringReproducibility of ResultsPlasticsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID30137965
PMCPMC6146318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.