ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2017
Time-varying and state-dependent recovery rates in epidemiological models.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delay differential equations for the spatially resolved simulation of epidemics with specific application to COVID-19.Mathematical methods in the applied sciences · 2022Article
- Reconstructing contact network structure and cross-immunity patterns from multiple infection histories.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Transportation, the pathogen vector to rule them all: Evidence from the recent coronavirus pandemic.Journal of transport & health · 2021Article
- Use of the Hayami diffusive wave equation to model the relationship infected-recoveries-deaths of Covid-19 pandemic.Epidemiology and infection · 2021Article
- Testing, tracing and isolation in compartmental models.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A generalized differential equation compartmental model of infectious disease transmission.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential equation models of infectious disease have undergone many theoretical extensions that are invaluable for the evaluation of disease spread. For instance, while one traditionally uses a bilinear term to describe the incidence rate of infection, physically more realistic generalizations exist to account for effects such as the saturation of infection. However, such theoretical extensions of recovery rates in differential equation models have only started to be developed. This is despite the fact that a constant rate often does not provide a good description of the dynamics of recovery and that the recovery rate is arguably as important as the incidence rate in governing the dynamics of a system. We provide a first-principles derivation of state-dependent and time-varying recovery rates in differential equation models of infectious disease. Through this derivation, we demonstrate how to obtain time-varying and state-dependent recovery rates based on the family of Pearson distributions and a power-law distribution, respectively. For recovery rates based on the family of Pearson distributions, we show that uncertainty in skewness, in comparison to other statistical moments, is at least two times more impactful on the sensitivity of predicting an epidemic's peak. In addition, using recovery rates based on a power-law distribution, we provide a procedure to obtain state-dependent recovery rates. For such state-dependent rates, we derive a natural connection between recovery rate parameters with the mean and standard deviation of a power-law distribution, illustrating the impact that standard deviation has on the shape of an epidemic wave.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.