Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137686›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2018

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil for resectable esophageal cancer: A phase II study.

Hiroyuki Ohnuma, Yasushi Sato, Naotaka Hayasaka, Teppei Matsuno, Chisa Fujita, Masanori Sato, Takahiro Osuga, Masahiro Hirakawa, Koji Miyanishi, Tamotsu Sagawa and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki OhnumaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4350-6971
Yasushi SatoDepartment of Community Medicine for Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Naotaka HayasakaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Teppei MatsunoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Chisa FujitaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masanori SatoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Takahiro OsugaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masahiro HirakawaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Koji MiyanishiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Tamotsu SagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Koshi FujikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Motoh OhiDivision of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Kyoritsu Gorinbashi Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yutaka OkagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yasushi TsujiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Michiaki HirayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Tatsuya ItoDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Takayuki NobuokaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Ichiro TakemasaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masayoshi KobuneDepartment of Hematology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Junji KatoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Sapporo Medical University · JPTonan Hospital · JPTokushima University · JP

Funding

Alexion PharmaceuticalsAsahi Kasei PharmaAstellas PharmaChugai PharmaceuticalDaiichi SankyoEisaiKyowa Hakko KirinOno PharmaceuticalOtsuka PharmaceuticalPfizer JapanShionogiSymBio PharmaceuticalsTaiho PharmaceuticalToyama Chemical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is regarded as standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan, but the prognosis remains poor. We have previously described how definitive chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DNF) led to a very high response rate and promising survival times. We therefore undertook a phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant DNF. The study included patients with clinical stage Ib-III ESCC. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. docetaxel (30 mg/m

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDocetaxelDrug Administration ScheduleEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluorouracilHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyDocetaxelFluorouracilnedaplatinOrganoplatinum CompoundsTaxoidsdocetaxelesophageal canceresophageal squamous cell carcinomanedaplatinneoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30137686
PMCPMC6215867
OpenAlexW2888298256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.