Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137631›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2018

Differential effects of parent and peer presence on neural correlates of risk taking in adolescence.

Jorien van Hoorn, Ethan M McCormick, Christina R Rogers, Susannah L Ivory, Eva H Telzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Covert neural and autonomic signatures of shared perception.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Where You Lead, I Will Follow: Exploring Sibling Similarity in Brain and Behavior During Risky Decision Making.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  15. Neural Correlates of Conflicting Social Influence on Adolescent Risk Taking.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Expectations of Social Consequences Impact Anticipated Involvement in Health-Risk Behavior During Adolescence.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Differential Behavioral and Neural Profiles in Youth With Conduct Problems During Risky Decision-Making.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorien van Hoorn
Ethan M McCormick
Christina R Rogers
Susannah L Ivory
Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Incorporating the Social Context into Neurocognitive Models of Adolescent Risk TakingR01DA039923 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a developmental period associated with increased health-risk behaviors and unique sensitivity to the input from the social context, paralleled by major changes in the developing brain. Peer presence increases adolescent risk taking, associated with greater reward-related activity, while parental presence decreases risk taking, associated with decreased reward-related activity and increased cognitive control. Yet the effects specific to peers and parents are still unknown. The current functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study compared within-person peer and parent influences on risky decision-making during adolescence (ages 12-15 years; N = 56). Participants completed the Yellow Light Game (YLG), a computerized driving task, during which they could make safe or risky decisions, in the presence of a peer and their parent. Behavioral findings revealed no effects of social context on risk taking. At the neural level, a collection of affective, social and cognitive regions [ventral striatum (VS), temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)] was more active during decision-making with peers than parents. Additionally, functional connectivity analyses showed greater coupling between affective, social and cognitive control regions (VS-insula, VS-TPJ) during decision-making with parents than peers. These findings highlight the complex nature of social influence processes in peer and parent contexts, and contribute to our understanding of the opportunities and vulnerabilities associated with adolescent social sensitivity.

Indexed as

ParentsPeer InfluenceRisk-TakingSocial EnvironmentAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAffectBrain MappingCerebral CortexChildDecision MakingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID30137631
PMCPMC6137311
OpenAlexW2887977336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.