Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137569›Full record

SynthesisJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2019

The relationship between buildings and health: a systematic review.

Janet Ige, Paul Pilkington, Judy Orme, Ben Williams, Emily Prestwood, D Black, Laurence Carmichael, Gabriel Scally

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janet IgeDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Paul PilkingtonDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Judy OrmeDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Ben WilliamsAir Quality Management Resource Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Emily PrestwoodAir Quality Management Resource Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
D BlackDaniel Black + Associates | db+a, Bristol, UK.
Laurence CarmichaelWHO Collaborating Centre for Healthy Urban Environments, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Gabriel ScallyWHO Collaborating Centre for Healthy Urban Environments, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S037586/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106857/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe built environment exerts one of the strongest directly measurable effects on physical and mental health, yet the evidence base underpinning the design of healthy urban planning is not fully developed.

methodThis study provides a systematic review of quantitative studies assessing the impact of buildings on health. In total, 7127 studies were identified from a structured search of eight databases combined with manual searching for grey literature. Only quantitative studies conducted between January 2000 and November 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Studies were assessed using the quality assessment tool for quantitative studies.

resultsIn total, 39 studies were included in this review. Findings showed consistently that housing refurbishment and modifications, provision of adequate heating, improvements to ventilation and water supply were associated with improved respiratory outcomes, quality of life and mental health. Prioritization of housing for vulnerable groups led to improved wellbeing. However, the quality of the underpinning evidence and lack of methodological rigour in most of the studies makes it difficult to draw causal links.

conclusionThis review identified evidence to demonstrate the strong association between certain features of housing and wellbeing such as adequate heating and ventilation. Our findings highlight the need for strengthening of the evidence base in order for meaningful conclusions to be drawn.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentHealthHousingHumansbuildingshealthhousing

Identifiers

PMID30137569
PMCPMC6645246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.