Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137455›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2019

Distress Intolerance and Smoking Topography in the Context of a Biological Challenge.

Samantha G Farris, Elizabeth R Aston, Teresa M Leyro, Lily A Brown, Michael J Zvolensky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Momentary precipitants connecting stress and smoking lapse during a quit attempt.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  4. Negative urgency and ad-libitum smoking topography.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2019
    Article
  5. Non-pharmacological Treatments for Tobacco Users With Mental Health Symptoms.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samantha G FarrisDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Elizabeth R AstonCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health at Brown University, Providence, RI.
Teresa M LeyroDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Lily A BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Michael J ZvolenskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX.

Funding

Behavioral Economic Analysis of Demand for MarijuanaK01DA039311 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ASTON, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2019
$902k
Panic-Relevant Sensations and Smoking MotivationF31DA035564 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FARRIS, SAMANTHA GWEN · 2013 to 2015
$101k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA035564NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDistress intolerance (DI), one's perceived or behavioral incapacity to withstand distress, is implicated in psychopathology and smoking. This study evaluated the effect of DI on smoking reinforcement in the context of a carbon dioxide (CO2) biological challenge.

methodsAdult daily smokers (n = 90; 48.9% female) were randomized to receive a single inhalation/breath of 35% CO2-enriched air (n = 45) or compressed room air (n = 45). Perceived DI was assessed before the challenge. Smoking reinforcement was examined via average post-challenge puff volume across puffs and at the puff-to-puff level.

resultsHigher DI was associated with an increased average puff volume (b = -4.7, p = .031). CO2 produced decreased average puff volume compared with room air (b = -7.7, p = .018). There was a DI* condition interaction (ƒ2 = 0.02), such that CO2 decreased average puff volume compared with room air in smokers with higher DI (b = -13.9, t = -3.06, p = .003), but not lower DI. At the puff-to-puff level, there was a significant interaction between DI, condition, and cubic time (b = 0.0003, p =. 037). Specifically, room air produced large initial puff volumes that decreased from puff to puff over the cigarette for high- and low-DI smokers. CO2 produced persistent flat volumes from puff to puff over the cigarette for higher DI smokers, whereas CO2 produced puff volumes like that of room air in lower DI smokers. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest DI heightens smoking reinforcement generally, and in the context of intense cardiorespiratory distress, is associated with stable and persistent smoking. DI is a promising therapeutic target that, if addressed through psychological intervention, may improve cessation outcomes by decreasing smoking reinforcement. IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes to our understanding of the relationship between DI and smoking reinforcement, via examining these processes in response to acute cardiorespiratory distress. Specifically, we found that smokers who are less tolerant of distress, as opposed to those who are more tolerant, evince a decrease in average puff volume, and consistently low puff-to-puff volume, in response to a biological stressor. These findings suggest that smokers high in DI alter smoking behavior following acute cardiorespiratory distress, perhaps to reduce overstimulation, yet also persist in smoking in a manner that suggests an inability to achieve satiation.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultCarbon DioxideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandom AllocationReinforcement, PsychologySmokersStress, PsychologicalTobacco SmokingCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID30137455
PMCPMC6468131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.