Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137439›Full record

ReviewNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2019

Enhanced Sensory-Cognitive Processing by Activation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors.

Susan M Gil, Raju Metherate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acute Effects of Nicotine on Physiological Responses and Sport Performance in Healthy Baseball Players.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Nicotinic Receptor Subunit Distribution in Auditory Cortex: Impact of Aging on Receptor Number and Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Therapeutic Applications of Nicotinic Stimulation: Successes, Failures, and Future Prospects.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susan M GilDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for Hearing Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Raju MetherateDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for Hearing Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.

Funding

Nicotinic enhancement of auditory-cognitive processingR01DC017687 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Functions of Nicotine Receptors in Sensory NeocortexR01DC013200 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI METHERATE, RAJU · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013200NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) enhances sensory-cognitive function in human subjects and animal models, yet the neural mechanisms are not fully understood. This review summarizes recent studies on nicotinic regulation of neural processing in the cerebral cortex that point to potential mechanisms underlying enhanced cognitive function. Studies from our laboratory focus on nicotinic regulation of auditory cortex and implications for auditory-cognitive processing, but relevant emerging insights from multiple brain regions are discussed. Although the major contributions of the predominant nAChRs containing α7 (homomeric receptors) or α4 and β2 (heteromeric) subunits are well recognized, recent results point to additional, potentially critical contributions from α2 subunits that are relatively sparse in cortex. Ongoing studies aim to elucidate the specific contributions to cognitive and cortical function of diverse nAChRs. IMPLICATIONS: This review highlights the therapeutic potential of activating nAChRs in the cerebral cortex to enhance cognitive function. Future work also must determine the contributions of relatively rare but important nAChR subtypes, potentially to develop more selective treatments for cognitive deficits.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionCognition DisordersHumansNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, NicotinicSensation DisordersNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID30137439
PMCPMC6379024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.