Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137374›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2018

Genetic Characterization of Some Neoponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Populations Within the foetida Species Complex.

Rebeca P Santos, Cléa S F Mariano, Jacques H C Delabie, Marco A Costa, Kátia M Lima, Silvia G Pompolo, Itanna O Fernandes, Elder A Miranda, Antonio F Carvalho, Janisete G Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebeca P SantosDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Cléa S F MarianoDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Jacques H C DelabieLaboratório de Mirmecologia, Centro de Pesquisa do Cacau, Caixa Postal, Itabuna, Bahia, Brazil.
Marco A CostaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Kátia M LimaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Silvia G PompoloLaboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Itanna O FernandesInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Av. Andre´ Araujo, Petro´polis, Cx. Postal, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Elder A MirandaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Antonio F CarvalhoDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Janisete G SilvaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The foetida species complex comprises 13 Neotropical species in the ant genus Neoponera. Neoponera villosa Fabricius (1804) , Neoponera inversa Smith (1858), Neoponera bactronica Fernandes, Oliveira & Delabie (2013), and Neoponera curvinodis (Forel, 1899) have had an ambiguous taxonomic status for more than two decades. In southern Bahia, Brazil, these four species are frequently found in sympatry. Here we used Bayesian Inference and maximum likelihood analyses of COI and 16S mtDNA sequence data and conventional cytogenetic data together with observations on morphology to characterize sympatric populations of N. villosa, N. inversa, N. bactronica, and N. curvinodis. Our results showed marked differences in the karyotype of these ants. Both N. curvinodis and N. inversa have chromosome number of 2n = 30. Their chromosome composition, however, is distinct, which indicates that N. curvinodis is more closely related to N. bactronica. These four species clustered into three distinct groups. The close relationship between N. bactronica and N. curvinodis deserves further investigation since it has not been fully resolved here. Our results confirm that N. inversa, N. villosa, N. bactronica + N. curvinodis indeed represent four distinct taxa within the foetida species complex.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, InsectKaryotypeAnimalsAntsBrazilDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30137374
PMCPMC6105101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.