Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137283›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Trends in High-grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer Screening in 5 States, 2008-2015.

Julia Warner Gargano, Ina U Park, Marie R Griffin, Linda M Niccolai, Melissa Powell, Nancy M Bennett, Michelle L Johnson Jones, Erin Whitney, Manideepthi Pemmaraju, Monica Brackney and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Julia Warner GarganoNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Ina U ParkDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco.
Marie R GriffinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Linda M NiccolaiYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Melissa PowellOregon Health Authority Public Health Division, Portland.
Nancy M BennettUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.
Michelle L Johnson JonesNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Erin WhitneyCalifornia Emerging Infections Program, Richmond.
Manideepthi PemmarajuVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Monica BrackneyYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Nasreen AbdullahOregon Health Authority Public Health Division, Portland.
Mary ScahillUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.
Rebecca M DahlMAXIMUS Federal, contracting agency to National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Angela A ClevelandNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Elizabeth R UngerNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lauri E MarkowitzNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
HPV-IMPACT Working Group
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USOregon Health Authority · USUniversity of Rochester · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USYale New Haven Health System · USNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000042 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$14.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe changes in rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2, 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+) during a period of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake and changing cervical cancer screening recommendations.

methodsWe conducted population-based laboratory surveillance for CIN2+ in catchment areas in 5 states, 2008-2015. We calculated age-specific CIN2+ rates per 100000 women by age groups. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) of CIN2+ for 2-year periods among all women and among screened women to evaluate changes over time.

resultsA total of 16572 CIN2+ cases were reported. Among women aged 18-20 and 21-24 years, CIN2+ rates declined in all sites, whereas in women aged 25-29, 30-34, and 35-39 years, trends differed across sites. The percent of women screened annually declined in all sites and age groups. Compared to 2008-2009, rates among screened women were significantly lower for all 3 periods in women aged 18-20 years (2010-2011: IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.99; 2012-2013: IRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85; 2014-2015: IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.68) and lower for the latter 2 time periods in women aged 21-24 years (2012-2013: IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; 2014-2015: IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.67).

conclusionsFrom 2008-2015, both CIN2+ rates and cervical cancer screening declined in women aged 18-24 years. The significant decreases in CIN2+ rates among screened women aged 18-24 years are consistent with a population-level impact of HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma in SituAdolescentAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPapillomavirus VaccinesUnited StatesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinescervical intraepithelial neoplasiadisease surveillancehuman papillomavirusvaccine impact

Identifiers

PMID30137283
PMCPMC6783904
OpenAlexW2888268883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.