Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30137196›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT).

J Mateo, D Chakravarty, R Dienstmann, S Jezdic, A Gonzalez-Perez, N Lopez-Bigas, C K Y Ng, P L Bedard, G Tortora, J-Y Douillard and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 426 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
426citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

426 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for cancer of unknown primary (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for biliary tract cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Guideline
  10. Guideline
  11. Guideline
  12. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  13. Guideline
  14. Guideline
  15. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  16. Guideline
  17. Guideline
  18. Guideline
  19. Guideline
  20. Trial

366 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

J MateoVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
D ChakravartyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
R DienstmannVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
S JezdicEuropean Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland.
A Gonzalez-PerezInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB), Barcelona.
N Lopez-BigasInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB), Barcelona; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
C K Y NgUniversity Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
P L BedardPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
G TortoraUniversity of Verona, Verona; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
J-Y DouillardEuropean Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland.
E M Van AllenHarvard Medical School Dana-Farber Cancer Center and Broad Institute, Boston, USA.
N SchultzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
C SwantonThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
F AndréInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: education@esmo.org.
L PusztaiYale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council FC001169Medical Research Council FC001202NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Wellcome Trust FC001169Wellcome Trust FC001202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In order to facilitate implementation of precision medicine in clinical management of cancer, there is a need to harmonise and standardise the reporting and interpretation of clinically relevant genomics data. Methods: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) launched a collaborative project to propose a classification system for molecular aberrations based on the evidence available supporting their value as clinical targets. A group of experts from several institutions was assembled to review available evidence, reach a consensus on grading criteria and present a classification system. This was then reviewed, amended and finally approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership. Results: This first version of the ESMO Scale of Clinical Actionability for molecular Targets (ESCAT) defines six levels of clinical evidence for molecular targets according to the implications for patient management: tier I, targets ready for implementation in routine clinical decisions; tier II, investigational targets that likely define a patient population that benefits from a targeted drug but additional data are needed; tier III, clinical benefit previously demonstrated in other tumour types or for similar molecular targets; tier IV, preclinical evidence of actionability; tier V, evidence supporting co-targeting approaches; and tier X, lack of evidence for actionability. Conclusions: The ESCAT defines clinical evidence-based criteria to prioritise genomic alterations as markers to select patients for targeted therapies. This classification system aims to offer a common language for all the relevant stakeholders in cancer medicine and drug development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyConsensusDatabases, GeneticEuropeGenomicsHumansMedical OncologyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPatient SelectionPrecision MedicineResearch DesignSocieties, MedicalAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30137196
PMCPMC6158764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.