Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30136695›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2018

Decellularized sciatic nerve matrix as a biodegradable conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Jongbae Choi, Jun Ho Kim, Ji Wook Jang, Hyun Jung Kim, Sung Hoon Choi, Sung Won Kwon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The application of collagen in the repair of peripheral nerve defect.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jongbae ChoiR&D Center, Genewel Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Jun Ho KimR&D Center, Genewel Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Ji Wook JangR&D Center, Genewel Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Hyun Jung KimR&D Center, Genewel Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Sung Hoon ChoiDepartment of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Sung Won KwonDepartment of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
CHA University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of autologous nerve grafts remains the gold standard for treating nerve defects, but current nerve repair techniques are limited by donor tissue availability and morbidity associated with tissue loss. Recently, the use of conduits in nerve injury repair, made possible by tissue engineering, has shown therapeutic potential. We manufactured a biodegradable, collagen-based nerve conduit containing decellularized sciatic nerve matrix and compared this with a silicone conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration using a rat model. The collagen-based conduit contains nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and laminin, as demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the collagen-based conduit had an outer wall to prevent scar tissue infiltration and a porous inner structure to allow axonal growth. Rats that were implanted with the collagen-based conduit to bridge a sciatic nerve defect experienced significantly improved motor and sensory nerve functions and greatly enhanced nerve regeneration compared with rats in the sham control group and the silicone conduit group. Our results suggest that the biodegradable collagen-based nerve conduit is more effective for peripheral nerve regeneration than the silicone conduit.

Indexed as

biodegradablecollagendecellularizedgrowth factornerve conduitnerve regenerationperipheral nerve injuryrat modelregenerationsilicone conduit

Identifiers

PMID30136695
PMCPMC6128056
OpenAlexW2888065790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.