ArticleNeural regeneration research2018
Developmental dependence for functional eye regrowth in
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Post-Surgical Retinal Progenitor Cell Niche is the Primary Source of Embryonic Eye Regrowth inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Notch Is Required for Neural Progenitor Proliferation During Embryonic Eye Regrowth.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Temporal Transcriptomic Profiling of the DevelopingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022Review
- From Cell Death to Regeneration: Rebuilding After Injury.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Apoptosome-dependent myotube formation involves activation of caspase-3 in differentiating myoblasts.Cell death & disease · 2020Article
- Studying In Vivo Retinal Progenitor Cell Proliferation in Xenopus laevis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Article
- Using theFrontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.