Trial reportInternational wound journal2019
A confirmatory study on the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane dHACM allograft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled study of 110 patients from 14 wound clinics.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-Like Placental Products for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A 12-Week Randomised-Trial Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing the Outcomes and Complications of Skin Allografts in Healing Diabetic Foot and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.International wound journal · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of biologically and tissue-derived therapies for the treatment of diabetic foot.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Human amniotic membrane products for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. do they help? a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2022Pooled it
- A Net Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Types of Dressings in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review on the rational use of amniotic membrane allografts in diabetic foot ulcer treatment.BMC surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Skin Substitutes for Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2021Pooled it
- Human amniotic membrane allograft, a novel treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.International wound journal · 2020Pooled it
- Palatal donor site wound healing following mucogingival surgery using amnion-chorion membrane: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of periodontology · 2026Trial
- Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre clinical trial.International wound journal · 2022Trial
- The effectiveness of a new dried human amnion derived membrane in addition to standard care in treating diabetic foot ulcers: A patient and assessor blind, randomised controlled pilot study.International wound journal · 2021Trial
- Complete wound closure following a single topical application of a novel autologous homologous skin construct: first evaluation in an open-label, single-arm feasibility study in diabetic foot ulcers.International wound journal · 2020Trial
- A confirmatory study on the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane dHACM allograft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled study of 110 patients from 14 wound clinics.International wound journal · 2019Trial
- A multicentre prospective randomised controlled comparative parallel study of dehydrated human umbilical cord (EpiCord) allograft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.International wound journal · 2019Trial
- Early Outpatient bFGF-Based Wound Care for Foot Lesions in Haemodialysis Patients: A Real-World Stepwise Limb-Salvage Strategy From Japan.International wound journal · 2026Observational
- Multimodal Bioactive Approaches in Smart Dressings for Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Local Therapies in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Promises, Limitations and Unmet Needs.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A randomised, controlled multicentre clinical trial was conducted at 14 wound care centres in the United States to confirm the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft (dHACM) for the treatment of chronic lower extremity ulcers in persons with diabetes. Patients with a lower extremity ulcer of at least 4 weeks duration were entered into a 2-week study run-in phase and treated with alginate wound dressings and appropriate offloading. Those with less than or equal to 25% wound closure after run-in were randomly assigned to receive weekly dHACM application in addition to offloading or standard of care with alginate wound dressings, for 12 weeks. A total of 110 patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, with n = 54 in the dHACM group and n = 56 in the no-dHACM group. Of the participants, 98 completed the study per protocol, with 47 receiving dHACM and 51 not receiving dHACM. The primary study outcome was percentage of study ulcers completely healed in 12 weeks, with both ITT and per-protocol participants receiving weekly dHACM significantly more likely to completely heal than those not receiving dHACM (ITT-70% versus 50%, P = 0.0338, per-protocol-81% versus 55%, P = 0.0093). A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the time-to-healing performance with/without dHACM, showing a significantly improved time to healing with the use of allograft, log-rank P < 0.0187. Cox regression analysis showed that dHACM-treated subjects were more than twice as likely to heal completely within 12 weeks than no-dHACM subjects (HR: 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.57, P = 0.003). At the final follow up at 16 weeks, 95% of dHACM-healed ulcers and 86% of healed ulcers in the no-dHACM group remained closed. These results confirm that dHACM is an efficacious treatment for lower extremity ulcers in a heterogeneous patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.