Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30136417›Full record

SynthesisMaternal & child nutrition2019

Developing a core outcome set for childhood obesity prevention: A systematic review.

Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Ciara Griffin, Niamh McGrath, Elaine Toomey, Molly Byrne, Colette Kelly, Caroline Heary, Declan Devane, Patricia M Kearney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Scoping Review of Instruments Used to Measure Weight and Body Composition in Infants Under 1 Year.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Matvienko-SikarSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-6581
Ciara GriffinSchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Niamh McGrathSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Elaine ToomeySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Molly ByrneSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Colette KellySchool of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Caroline HearySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Declan DevaneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Patricia M KearneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthesis of effects of infant feeding interventions to prevent childhood obesity is limited by outcome measurement and reporting heterogeneity. Core outcome sets (COSs) represent standardised approaches to outcome selection and reporting. The aim of this review is to identify feeding outcomes used in infant feeding studies to inform an infant feeding COS for obesity prevention interventions. The databases EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO searched from inception to February 2017. Studies eligible for inclusion must examine any infant feeding outcome in children ≤1 year. Feeding outcomes include those measured using self-report and/or observational methods and include dietary intake, parent-child interaction, and parental beliefs, among others. Data were extracted using a standardised data extraction form. Outcomes were assigned to outcome domains using an inductive, iterative process with a multidisciplinary team. We identified 82 unique outcomes, representing nine outcome domains. Outcome domains were "breast and formula feeding," "introduction of solids," "parent feeding practices and styles," "parent knowledge and beliefs," "practical feeding," "food environment," "dietary intake," "perceptions of infant behaviour and preferences," and "child weight outcomes." Heterogeneity in definition and frequency of outcomes was noted in reviewed studies. "Introduction of solids" (59.5%) and "breastfeeding duration" (55.5%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. Infant feeding studies focus predominantly on consumption of milks and solids and infant weight. Less focus is given to modifiable parental and environmental factors. An infant feeding COS can minimise heterogeneity in selection and reporting of infant feeding outcomes for childhood obesity prevention interventions.

Indexed as

DietInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsPediatric Obesity“childhood obesity”“complementary feeding”“core outcome set”“food and nutrient Intake”“infant feeding”nutrition

Identifiers

PMID30136417
PMCPMC7199036
OpenAlexW2888059670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.